🔷 جدیدترین سوال رایتینگ گزارش شده از سنتر ایرسافام (نوع Discussion) + پاسخ نمره 9
✍️ @ielts2WritingCorrection
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖
📌 Some think that quality art can be made by anyone while others think that it requires special talent and ability.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.


🔻 The question of whether quality art can be produced by anyone or only by those with innate talent has long been a subject of debate. While some argue that artistic excellence is accessible to all with dedication, others believe it demands inherent skill. Both perspectives have valid points, but a balanced view acknowledges the interplay of practice and natural ability.


🔻پاسخ کامل نمره 9 این سوال + 700 نمونه رایتینگ دیگر در کانال پریمیوم رایتینگ

📌 کلمات ربط و افزایش انسجام داخل و بین پاراگرافی (Coherence and Cohesion)
1. However
📝 Writing (Academic/GT):
"Renewable energy is crucial for a sustainable future; however, many countries still rely heavily on fossil fuels."

🎤 Speaking (Part 3):
"I love living in big cities because of the opportunities. However, the high cost of living can be a major downside." 😕

2. Yet
📝 Writing (Task 2 - Contrasting Ideas):
"Technology has made communication faster, yet many people feel more isolated than ever."

🎤 Speaking (Part 2 - Describing a Problem):
"My city has improved public transport, yet traffic jams are still a huge issue." 🚗💨

3. In contrast
📝 Writing (Comparing Data in Task 1):
"In 2000, 60% of households owned a car. In contrast, by 2020, this figure had risen to 85%."

👈 دیگر کلمات این گروه:
Conversely, on the contrary, otherwise, nevertheless, notwithstanding, in spite of this, by contrast, whereas

✍️ از سوالات پرتکرار رایتینگ آیلتس در سال های گذشته + پاسخ نمره 9 (نوع Agree Disagree)
💎 @ielts2Com
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖

📌 Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?


The argument that wild animals have no place in the 21st century and that protecting them is a waste of resources is both shortsighted and ecologically dangerous. I strongly disagree with this statement, as wildlife plays a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity, ecological balance, and even human survival. Rather than being obsolete, wild animals are indispensable to a sustainable future.

First, biodiversity is essential for healthy ecosystems. Wild animals contribute to processes such as pollination, seed dispersal, and natural pest control, which are vital for agriculture and food security. The extinction of key species can trigger a domino effect, destabilizing entire ecosystems and harming human livelihoods. For example, the decline of bees—a keystone species—threatens global food production, illustrating how wildlife conservation directly benefits humanity.

Second, wild animals have intrinsic value beyond their utility to humans. Many species possess complex behaviors, social structures, and emotional capacities, making their preservation an ethical obligation. Additionally, ecosystems like rainforests and oceans, which depend on wildlife, act as carbon sinks, mitigating climate change. Destroying these habitats for short-term economic gain would accelerate environmental crises.

Critics may argue that resources spent on wildlife protection could be better used for poverty alleviation or infrastructure. However, this is a false dichotomy. Conservation efforts often create jobs through ecotourism and sustainable industries. For instance, countries like Kenya and Costa Rica benefit economically from wildlife tourism, proving that environmental and economic interests can align.

In conclusion, protecting wild animals is not a waste of resources but a critical investment in our planet’s future. Their extinction would have catastrophic consequences for ecosystems and human societies alike. Rather than dismissing wildlife as irrelevant, we must prioritize conservation to ensure ecological stability and ethical responsibility for generations to come.

🔻پاسخ کامل نمره 9 مجموعا 700 نمونه رایتینگ در کانال پریمیوم رایتینگ

سوال شما هم‌بود؟

‼️داوطلبین گرامی

✅ بر اساس ابلاغیه سازمان سنجش آموزش کشور، هزینه آزمون آیلتس از روز دوشنبه مورخ 1404/03/12 لغایت 1404/03/19 به مبلغ 226,187,500 ریال تغییر یافته است.

منبع: سنترهای رسمی آیلتس

💎 @ielts2Com
👥 @ielts2group

🔺 جدیدترین سوالات رایتینگ ایلتس (June 2025)
💎 @ielts2Com
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖
📌 Some people believe that schoolchildren should be allowed to make decisions about the school rules, while others think that teachers should be responsible for making the rules.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.


✍️ The question of whether schoolchildren should participate in creating school rules or if this responsibility should solely lie with teachers is a topic of ongoing debate. While some argue that student involvement fosters responsibility and engagement, others believe that teachers are better equipped to establish effective regulations. Both perspectives have valid points, which I will explore before presenting my own opinion.

On the one hand, allowing students to contribute to rule-making can have significant benefits. When children are given a voice, they develop a sense of ownership and responsibility toward their school environment. This can lead to greater compliance with rules, as students are more likely to respect regulations they helped create. Additionally, involving students in decision-making promotes critical thinking, teamwork, and democratic values, which are essential life skills. For example, schools that implement student councils often report improved behavior and a stronger sense of community.

On the other hand, opponents argue that teachers and school administrators are more experienced and knowledgeable about what is necessary to maintain discipline and an effective learning environment. Children may prioritize short-term desires over long-term benefits, potentially leading to impractical or overly lenient rules. For instance, students might vote against homework or strict attendance policies, which could negatively impact their education. Teachers, with their expertise, can balance fairness with discipline, ensuring that rules support academic success and safety.

In my opinion, a balanced approach is most effective. While teachers should have the final say in establishing fundamental rules, students should be consulted on certain policies that directly affect them. This compromise encourages responsibility and mutual respect while maintaining structure. For example, students could discuss classroom behavior expectations or event planning, while teachers retain authority over academic and safety-related regulations.

In conclusion, while teachers must ensure that school rules promote a productive environment, giving students a limited role in decision-making can enhance their engagement and personal development. A collaborative approach ultimately benefits the entire school community.


🔻پاسخ نمره 9 مجموعا 700 تاپیک جدید رایتینگ در کانال پریمیوم رایتینگ

سلام به همه عزیزان 🌹

یکی از سوالات رایج دوستان "امکان پرداخت شهریه در 2 یا 3 بخش در بازه زمانی 3 ماهه دوره" هست که باید خدمتتون عرض کنیم این امکان وجود داره و در حال حاضر هیچ افزایش شهریه ای هم وجود نخواهد داشت.

جهت یادآوری با پرداخت شهریه یک دوره امکان شرکت رایگان در یک دوره دیگه در صورت وجود هر گونه مشکل یا عدم پیشرفت وجود خواهد داشت.

اطلاعات دقیق تر و تعیین سطح را از مشاور درخواست بفرمایید 🙏

📞 مشاوره تلفنی و تلگرام: 09124873462

❤️100 Essays From #Examiners on Various Topics (2019)

🗣 @ielts2com
🗣 @ielts2SpeakingWriting
👥 @ielts2group

👈 دوره های آنلاین آیلتس مهندس ابوالقاسمی (با امکان تکرار رایگان)