📌 تاپیک های دیده نشده رایتینگ از سنترهای خارجی (آگست 2025)
💎 @ielts2Com
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖
✔️ Planting trees is very important for the environment. Some people say trees should be planted in vacant areas of cities and towns, while others argue that housing facilities should be built instead. Do you agree or disagree?

The debate over whether to use urban vacant spaces for planting trees or constructing housing facilities is complex, given the growing environmental concerns and housing shortages in cities. While some argue that residential buildings should take priority to accommodate rising populations, I firmly believe that urban greenery is equally essential and that a balanced approach is necessary.

On the one hand, housing is undeniably crucial, especially in densely populated cities where many struggle with affordability and homelessness. Rapid urbanization has led to soaring property prices, forcing low-income families into inadequate living conditions. Constructing affordable housing in vacant urban areas could alleviate this crisis, improving living standards and reducing inequality. Governments and developers often favor this approach due to its immediate economic benefits.

However, the environmental advantages of planting trees cannot be overlooked. Trees absorb carbon dioxide, mitigate air pollution, and reduce the urban heat island effect, making cities more livable. Green spaces also enhance mental well-being by providing recreational areas, which is vital in stressful urban environments. For instance, cities like Singapore have integrated extensive greenery into urban planning, proving that development and sustainability can coexist. Neglecting tree planting in favor of unchecked construction could worsen climate change and public health issues.

A pragmatic solution would be to integrate both priorities. Urban planners should designate specific zones for housing while reserving others for parks and tree-lined streets. Vertical gardens and rooftop green spaces can also compensate for limited land availability. Policies should mandate that new housing projects include green areas, ensuring a balance between development and environmental preservation.

In conclusion, while housing is a pressing need, sacrificing urban greenery would have long-term consequences. A well-planned approach that incorporates both housing and tree planting is the most sustainable way forward. Governments must enforce regulations that prioritize both human welfare and ecological health to create livable, resilient cities.

🔻مجموعا 800 تاپیک جدید با امکان #تصحیح_هفتگی رایتینگ های شما در کانال پریمیوم رایتینگ

📌 جدیدترین تاپیک های رایتینگ از سنترهای خارجی (آگست 2025)
✍️ @ielts2WritingCorrection
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔻Some people think the governments should act to decide how people live in order to have a healthier life. Others think individuals should decide their own lifestyle.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The question of whether governmental authority or individual choice should be the primary driver for healthier lifestyles is a central debate in public health. While some argue that state intervention is crucial for population-wide well-being, others contend that personal freedom is paramount. This essay will examine both perspectives before concluding that a synergistic approach is most effective.

Proponents of government intervention argue that individual choices are often influenced by powerful commercial interests and a lack of access to accurate information. Without top-down regulations, public health can suffer. For instance, governments can implement policies such as taxing sugary drinks and tobacco, which disincentivizes consumption and generates revenue for healthcare. Furthermore, mandates like clear nutritional labelling on food products empower citizens to make informed decisions. From this viewpoint, the state has a responsibility to protect its citizens from harmful products and create an environment where the healthy choice is the easier choice, ultimately reducing the burden on public health systems.

Conversely, advocates for personal autonomy emphasize that a one-size-fits-all approach dictated by the state is impractical and infringes on personal liberties. Lifestyle choices are deeply personal and often rooted in cultural, economic, or religious beliefs. For example, mandating a specific diet or exercise regime would be considered authoritarian. Moreover, individuals are ultimately responsible for their own bodies and well-being. They argue that education, rather than coercion, is the key. When people are educated about the benefits of a healthy lifestyle, they can make voluntary, sustainable changes that suit their individual circumstances, leading to more meaningful and long-lasting health outcomes.

In my opinion, a balanced collaboration between the government and the individual is indispensable. The government’s role should not be to dictate personal choices but to enable them. This can be achieved by ensuring public spaces are safe for exercise, subsidizing healthy foods like fruits and vegetables, and running public health campaigns. However, the onus must finally lie with the individual to incorporate this knowledge and these resources into their daily lives. Absolute freedom can lead to public health crises, while absolute control is tyrannical.

In conclusion, while individuals must retain the freedom to choose their own path, governments have a vital role in shaping an environment that promotes and facilitates healthier living. The most effective strategy is one where the state creates the conditions for health, and educated citizens are empowered to make responsible choices.

🔻آپدیت روزانه سوالات گزارش شده از سنتر ها + مجموعا 800 تاپیک جدید با امکان #تصحیح_هفتگی رایتینگ های شما در کانال پریمیوم رایتینگ

📌 جدیدترین تاپیک های رایتینگ از سنترهای خارجی (سپتمبر 2025)
💎 @ielts2Com
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖
🔻 Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.

Do you agree or disagree?

The proliferation of high-sugar food and drink has precipitated a global health crisis, contributing significantly to the rise in obesity, diabetes, and other metabolic diseases. While I acknowledge that making sugary products more expensive could be a useful tool in reducing consumption, I disagree that it should be the primary or sole strategy, as it is a regressive measure that fails to address the root causes of the problem.....

😎 پاسخ کامل نمره 9 این سوال + مجموعا 800 تاپیک جدید با امکان #تصحیح_هفتگی رایتینگ های شما در کانال پریمیوم رایتینگ

📌 The line graph below shows the average daily maximum temperatures for Auckland and Christchurland, two cities in New Zealand, and London and Edinburgh, two cities in the United Kingdom.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.


🔷 Sample Band +7 Answer

✍️ The diagram illustrates the average daily maximum temperatures in London and Edinburgh in the United Kingdom, and Auckland and Christchurch in New Zealand.

Overall, two UK cities follow the same pattern, with higher temperatures in the middle of the year and lower ones at the start and at the end. In comparison, two cities in New Zealand also follow identical patterns, but with lower temperatures in the middle of the year and higher ones at the start and at the end....

😎 پاسخ کامل نمره 7+ این سوال + مجموعا 800 تاپیک جدید با امکان #تصحیح_هفتگی رایتینگ های شما در کانال پریمیوم رایتینگ

❤️ #دوره_آفلاین آموزش کامل 4 مهارت آیلتس همراه با 100 #تصحیح رایتینگ (از #سطح_پایه)
🧑‍💻@ielts2course
👥 @ielts2Group
➖➖➖➖
✍️ با #پشتیبانی طلایی و #فیدبک دقیق

✔️ مناسب زبان آموزان با شیفت کاری چرخشی بدون امکان شرکت منظم در کلاس

👌 1000 دقیقه فایل ویدیویی آموزشی #رکورد شده تمامی سرفصل های آیلتس (#چهار_مهارت و تمامی نکات مربوطه)

📆 #برنامه_ریزی_دقیق برای 3 ماه تا 1 سال

📈 مناسب از سطح نمره 4.5 تا 5 با هدف نمره 7.5

📌 #تدریس مهندس ابوالقاسمی با نمره 8 آیلتس (8.5 اسپیکینگ و لیسنینگ و 8 رایتینگ) و 20 هزار ساعت تجربه تدریس و گلچین ویدیوهای اگزمینر های نیتیو

✔️ نمونه تدریس

❤️ #برنامه_ریزی_مجدد در صورت عقب افتادن از برنامه

🧑🏻‍🏫 #پشتیبانی شامل معرفی منابع اولیه و تکمیلی و پاسخگویی روزانه به سوالات زبان آموز

😍 100 #تصحیح_رایتینگ تسک 1 و 2 (دو رایتینگ هر هفته)

👈 #فیدبک_اسپیکینگ هفتگی

✔️ #دسترسی_دائمی تمامی ویدیوهای آموزشی + تمامی آپدیت ها #رایگان

📌شهریه دوره یکساله 7 میلیون تومان (#یک_سال پشتیبانی و دریافت #فیدبک)

👈 شهریه #بدون_فیدبک (3 میلیون تومان)

📞 مشاوره و ثبت نام در تلگرام: (09107751201)

✍️ از جدیدترین تاپیک های رایتینگ آیلتس درباره موضوع #رقابت
💎 @ielts2Com
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖
📌 Competitiveness is considered a positive quality for people in most societies.

How does competitiveness affect individuals?
Is it a positive or a negative trend?

Competitiveness is often hailed as a crucial driver of success and is actively encouraged in various spheres of life, from academia to the corporate world. While this trait can undoubtedly yield significant benefits for individuals, its impact is a double-edged sword, presenting both advantages and considerable drawbacks.

On the one hand, a competitive spirit can be a powerful motivator for personal growth. When individuals strive to outperform their peers, they are often pushed to expand their knowledge, refine their skills, and innovate. This can lead to higher academic achievements, career advancement, and the attainment of ambitious personal goals. For instance, an employee competing for a promotion may pursue additional qualifications or develop more efficient work strategies, thereby enhancing their professional value. Furthermore, competition teaches resilience; learning to cope with loss and failure in a competitive environment can build character and prepare individuals for the inevitable challenges of life.

On the other hand, an excessive or poorly managed competitive drive can have severe negative consequences for an individual's well-being. The relentless pressure to be the best can become a source of chronic stress, anxiety, and burnout. This is particularly evident in educational systems where students are constantly ranked, leading to immense psychological strain and, in some cases, a deterioration of mental health. Moreover, when winning becomes the sole objective, it can erode ethical standards and damage social relationships. An individual may resort to unethical practices, such as cheating or sabotaging others, and the focus shifts from collective progress to a selfish pursuit of personal glory, fostering a culture of suspicion and isolation rather than collaboration.

In conclusion, while competitiveness can serve as a positive catalyst for self-improvement and resilience, its effects are not universally beneficial. The trend becomes negative when it escalates to an unhealthy level, compromising an individual's mental health and moral integrity. Therefore, it is not competitiveness itself, but its manifestation—whether it is a healthy drive for self-betterment or a toxic need to dominate—that determines its ultimate value. A balanced approach, where competition is tempered with cooperation and a focus on personal mastery rather than just victory, is essential for it to be a truly positive force.

🔻آپدیت روزانه سوالات گزارش شده از سنتر ها + مجموعا 800 تاپیک جدید با امکان #تصحیح_هفتگی رایتینگ های شما در کانال پریمیوم رایتینگ