https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=61024&QS=%2B&TP=JU
媒体报道中的「不偏不倚」是什么意思？
“Due impartiality also does not require absolute neutrality on every issue of public concern or detachment from such fundamental principles as freedom, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law – principles which are essential to a just and open society. We will be failing in our duty if in the attempt to upset no-one, to disturb no institution, we limit the comprehensiveness and open examination of issues and events.”
The concept of ‘impartiality’ is a broad concept. In my judgment, a code of practice that requires all factual programmes dealing with matters of public policy or controversial public issues to be appropriately impartial may still comply with the constitutional requirement to uphold freedom of speech and expression if the term is given a broad and suitably equitable meaning.
The word ‘impartial’ encompasses, of course, the concept of being balanced, of not favouring one side more than another. In certain circumstances, that may in a television programme demand the putting of both sides of the story. But the word also means ‘unprejudiced, unbiased, fair’ : The Shorter Oxford Dictionary (6th Ed).
Impartiality, therefore, may demand no more than that the subject matter is dealt with fairly; that no prejudice is shown – either for or against – matters that are portrayed. Indeed, it may be said that such treatment is one of the hallmarks of documentary film-making.
In my judgment, in the broad language used, the prevailing code of practice recognises, or at least allows for, a presentation which is impartial simply because it is fair and not prejudiced either for or against the issues raised. That, I believe, is provided for in the prevailing code of practice :
“ Due impartiality requires the licensees to deal even-handedly when opposing points of view are presented in a programme. Balance should be sought through the presentation, as far as possible, of principal relevant viewpoints on matters of public importance. Programmes should not be slanted by the concealment of facts or by misleading emphasis. …
In achieving due impartiality, the term ‘due’ is to be interpreted as meaning adequate or appropriate to the nature of the subject and the type of programme. Due impartiality does not mean that ‘balance’ is required in the sense of equal time or an equal number of lines in the script being devoted to each view, nor does it require absolute neutrality on every controversial issue. Judgement will always be called for by the licensees.”
媒体报道中的「不偏不倚」是什么意思？
“Due impartiality also does not require absolute neutrality on every issue of public concern or detachment from such fundamental principles as freedom, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law – principles which are essential to a just and open society. We will be failing in our duty if in the attempt to upset no-one, to disturb no institution, we limit the comprehensiveness and open examination of issues and events.”
The concept of ‘impartiality’ is a broad concept. In my judgment, a code of practice that requires all factual programmes dealing with matters of public policy or controversial public issues to be appropriately impartial may still comply with the constitutional requirement to uphold freedom of speech and expression if the term is given a broad and suitably equitable meaning.
The word ‘impartial’ encompasses, of course, the concept of being balanced, of not favouring one side more than another. In certain circumstances, that may in a television programme demand the putting of both sides of the story. But the word also means ‘unprejudiced, unbiased, fair’ : The Shorter Oxford Dictionary (6th Ed).
Impartiality, therefore, may demand no more than that the subject matter is dealt with fairly; that no prejudice is shown – either for or against – matters that are portrayed. Indeed, it may be said that such treatment is one of the hallmarks of documentary film-making.
In my judgment, in the broad language used, the prevailing code of practice recognises, or at least allows for, a presentation which is impartial simply because it is fair and not prejudiced either for or against the issues raised. That, I believe, is provided for in the prevailing code of practice :
“ Due impartiality requires the licensees to deal even-handedly when opposing points of view are presented in a programme. Balance should be sought through the presentation, as far as possible, of principal relevant viewpoints on matters of public importance. Programmes should not be slanted by the concealment of facts or by misleading emphasis. …
In achieving due impartiality, the term ‘due’ is to be interpreted as meaning adequate or appropriate to the nature of the subject and the type of programme. Due impartiality does not mean that ‘balance’ is required in the sense of equal time or an equal number of lines in the script being devoted to each view, nor does it require absolute neutrality on every controversial issue. Judgement will always be called for by the licensees.”
突然意识到自己竟然还会时常使用百度搜索，主要是为了查询某个外文信息在中文世界里的表达。原理是百度搜索作为一个局域网搜索引擎，不管输入什么内容都会优先搜索中文内容。不知道算不算烂饭细吃。😅
#whisper
#whisper
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/lockdown-in-the-data-colony-tracking-the-long-term-costs-of-connection-tickets-106151156968
#event
数据殖民主义
#event
数据殖民主义
Eventbrite
Lockdown in the Data Colony: Tracking the Long-term Costs of Connection
Join us for a virtual event with the authors of The Costs of Connection in conversation with Safiya Umoja Noble.
https://twitter.com/NotionStatus/status/1264713745105707009
Notion在中国被屏蔽了，准确的说，应该是在昨晚22点50分左右被屏蔽了。我为什么知道？因为我正在用，眼看着软件无法同步了。
The time was around 22:50 last night, I know it because I was just using it when the blocking actually happened.
Notion在中国被屏蔽了，准确的说，应该是在昨晚22点50分左右被屏蔽了。我为什么知道？因为我正在用，眼看着软件无法同步了。
The time was around 22:50 last night, I know it because I was just using it when the blocking actually happened.
Twitter
Notion Status
Notion is blocked by a firewall in China. We are monitoring the situation and will continue to post updates.
几个有意思的哲学剃刀：
格莱斯剃刀：作为一种简约原则，对于语言解释而言，会话含义优于语义语境。
汉隆剃刀：如果可以充分解释为愚蠢，就永远不要归咎于恶意。
希钦斯剃刀：无证据的论证过程可以被无证据地否定。
哲学剃刀（Philosophical razor）指的是能指导人们排除（剃掉）一个现象中不太可能的解释或避免不必要行动的一个原则或经验法则 。
格莱斯剃刀：作为一种简约原则，对于语言解释而言，会话含义优于语义语境。
汉隆剃刀：如果可以充分解释为愚蠢，就永远不要归咎于恶意。
希钦斯剃刀：无证据的论证过程可以被无证据地否定。
哲学剃刀（Philosophical razor）指的是能指导人们排除（剃掉）一个现象中不太可能的解释或避免不必要行动的一个原则或经验法则 。
Wikipedia
哲学剃刀
哲学原则
#whisper
每次上网都要被迫假装自己是英国人、日本人、韩国人、美国人、印度人、爱尔兰人、冰岛人、芬兰人、瑞典人、阿根廷人……——ip难民的日常
每次上网都要被迫假装自己是英国人、日本人、韩国人、美国人、印度人、爱尔兰人、冰岛人、芬兰人、瑞典人、阿根廷人……——ip难民的日常
#whisper
PaperClip出了关于民法典的一期视频，但这期视频却可能也是他们做的最差的一期。（当然，对他们因为要表忠求存或是要恰饭而这么做，我是可以理解的。）而这也再次证明，思考和跑步的区别就在于：跑步的时候，不管跑道在哪，都可以跑得很快，而思考如果有了「跑道」，就无法思考也不需要思考了。
PaperClip出了关于民法典的一期视频，但这期视频却可能也是他们做的最差的一期。（当然，对他们因为要表忠求存或是要恰饭而这么做，我是可以理解的。）而这也再次证明，思考和跑步的区别就在于：跑步的时候，不管跑道在哪，都可以跑得很快，而思考如果有了「跑道」，就无法思考也不需要思考了。