Der investigative Videokünstler Matt Orfalea hat ein brillantes Video zu Anthony Faucis Gaslighting, Widersprüchen und Lügen zusammengestellt, das sich wirklich zu sehen lohnt.

Originalquelle:
https://x.com/0rf/status/2053823920101581098?s=20

t.me/ayawasgeht

https://x.com/sarahnadav/status/2083502805000560647

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=pq7TfFFAvnM

Möchtet ihr den Witz hören?:

Ich denke, ich möchte jetzt friedlich einschlafen und NICHT MEHR AUFWACHEN. Ich habe meinen Job mit unserem Paper erledigt und sage, wieso es kein Happy End aus dieser Scheißeshow geben kann...

Während Vollpfosten wie McCairn euch eure Kohle aus der Tasche ziehen wollen...

"Whereas TPE is safe, it did not lead to any discernible improvement of the PCC in this clinical trial."

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-57198-7

Space recording: Global Covid Summit doctors and Sen Johnson react to Fauci testimony, hosted by Dr. Kat Lindley

12:57 AM · Jul 30, 2026

https://x.com/DrKatLindley/status/2082631730607858080

Warum man nicht zu sehr über die Möglichkeiten von Störungen im G Protein-Coupled Rezeptoren-Netzwerk nachdenken sollte:

≈800 GPCR x (L,C,P,I,A)

L = Lipidumgebung
C = Cholesterinstatus
P = Phosphoinositid-Zustand
I = Interaktionspartner
A = Aktivierungszustand

G Protein-Coupled Receptors: A Century of Research and Discovery

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38900852/

Ähm… Leute? Ich bekomme langsam Angst, versehentlich geselbstmordet zu werden:

Wenn sich unser LDMD-Ansatz für LNPs bewahrheitet… Ratet mal:

Man kann ihn auf sogenannte „Adjuvanzien“ anwenden (die natürlich nicht so stark reaktiv sind, wie es bei LNPs der Fall ist).

Flach TL, Ng G, Hari A, et al. Alum interaction with dendritic cell membrane lipids is essential for its adjuvanticity. Nat Med. 2011;17(4):479-487. doi:10.1038/nm.2306

Comparative Elimination Analysis of Lipid Nanoparticle-Encapsulated Human Erythropoietin mRNA by Multimodal Approaches Suggests an Effective Doping Control Strategy for mRNA-Based Agents

https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dta.70129

Was zum Geier?!

Reminder Teil 1

https://stephanieseneff.substack.com/p/are-lnp-mrna-vaccines-safe-part-1

Teil 2 ist da!

https://stephanieseneff.substack.com/p/the-lnp-safety-question-part-2

https://x.com/GirardotMarc/status/2084914984555823249

Ich bekomme bereits nach 5 Minuten zuhören Hirnzuckungen. :-S The big bogues theory.

Membrane environment sets the functional pKa of ionizable lipids

https://www.cell.com/biophysj/fulltext/S0006-3495(26)00456-X

"Chapter Volume 3 Conclusions

Translation initiation is a highly ordered process that is regulated primarily by phosphorylation of initiation factors, in particular those that are involved in 5′ mRNA cap recognition and eIF4F complex formation. Increased expression or differential phosphorylation of these initiation factors leads to changes in cellular translation rates, which can result in drastic changes in growth, proliferation, differentiation, and survival. For example, increased translation as a result of overexpression of eIF4E [51], or inappropriate activation of mTOR signaling to the 4E-BPs [67] is implicated in a variety of human cancers. Therefore, eukaryotic cells have evolved intricate mechanisms to regulate mRNA translation initiation."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/translation-initiation

Wow... Es wird immer wilder: Scheinbar sind nicht nur die Kopfgruppen der verschiedenen Phosphoinositidspezies/ Substrate relevant, sondern auch die Acylketten und deren Sättigungsgrad... (Einfluss auf Packungsdichte, Oberflächenladung, Krümmungsgrad, etc...?)

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.11.681803v1.full

"The zeta-potential, polydispersity index and encapsulation efficiency were similar in all formulations. These characteristics were also consistent between different batches of formulation 1. However, the functional performance of these batches varied: transfection of 0.2 × 106 cells/mL with 44.4 µg mRNA / 106 cells with batch A resulted, on average, in 55% GFP+ cells, which was significantly higher than batches B – D, ranging from 20% to 27% GFP+ cells (Figure S3). To test whether the variability observed in our batches was due to raw materials, batch D was produced with fresh reagents but did not result in similar performance to that observed in batch A. The use of a commercial versus in-house kits for preparation of uncapped mRNA also does not account for the observed differences, as batches A and B were both prepared using the commercial kit. While the root cause for batch variability has not been identified to date, the last 3 batches (B – D) have performed consistently (Figure S3)."

"To confirm that the increase in transfected cells per ng mRNA in concentrated cells was indeed due to more binding of the LNPs to cells, concentrated and dilute cells were washed after 1 and 3 h, respectively, to remove any LNPs remaining in the supernatant. The resulting %GFP+ live cells were compared to unwashed cells (Fig. 2E). Washing concentrated cells after just 1 h did not impact the %GFP+ cells. In dilute cells, on the other hand, the %GFP+ cells were reduced in a dose-dependent manner. It can thus be inferred that more transfecting LNPs bound to the concentrated cells within 1 h compared to the dilute cells, even after 3 h with 40x more LNPs per cell. The dose-dependent increase in transfection in dilute cells could be due to higher concentration of LNPs, which increases LNPs binding to cells."

Kunitskaya A, Chen SP, Ho CH, Del Grosso M, Blakney AK, Piret JM. Increased mRNA-lipid nanoparticle transfection per ng mRNA by concentrating cells. J Biotechnol. 2026;416:175-186. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2026.05.003

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168165626001562?via%3Dihub