Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
72.9K subscribers
14.2K photos
7.75K videos
621 files
27.7K links
Official Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar

Donations:
www.patreon.com/RobinMonotti
www.patreon.com/CoryMorningstar

Group is @robinmggroup

Also see:
robinmonotti.substack.com/

We don't DM from this channel account.
Download Telegram
What part of "if it does not stop infection or transmission it's not a vaccine it's a toxin" do some people still not understand?
If it don't walk like a vaccine or talk like a vaccine it ain't a vaccine. Call it a toxin, bioweapon, scam, you name it. But it damn well ain't a frickin vaccine!
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Breaking news: Spanish top court rules lockdown unconstitutional.
Among other matters, “limitations on movement violated citizens basic rights”.

Go, Iberians!! Last year, a senior court determined that the PCR test cannot diagnose illness not be used to restrain people.
I celebrate any & all such judgements.
It’s shows that not every institution everywhere is under the bus.
Cheers
Mike
Forwarded from Deleted Account
I compare the abortion effect of the COVID vaccine with the morning after pill.

When 827 pregnant women who took the COVID vaccine were studied, the authors of the study linked below don't show it clearly, but only 127 (827 - 700) were vaccinated in the first two trimesters (all the rest in the last trimester). Of those 127, there were 104 miscarriages. This is a miscarriage rate of 82%.

Now the morning-after abortion pill, RU-486, has an efficacy rate of 80% to 90%. (RU-486: An overview of mifepristone and its potential applications. Contracept Rep 1993 May;4(2):7-9.)

Therefore, the two drugs have comparable abortion potential, and must carry black box warnings and must be used only after ample warnings are given, and only with fully informed consent.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
Forwarded from Al F.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Crowds growing in protest of covid pass outside govt buildings in Dublin. Vote due to criminalize businesses for NOT implementing the covid green pass in pubs, restaurants, gyms, shops etc.
Forwarded from Al F.
Forwarded from Al F.
What u mean? This bit?

A. Anywhere selling alcohol
B. Every nightclub
C. Anywhere else we decide is 'relevent'

Wake up lad.
Forwarded from Ana
https://www.instagram.com/tv/CRUgagCDWbN/?utm_medium=copy_link Dutch president admits today that Klaus Shwab has sended him the book: Covid 19: The Great Reset. And that he has sended a thank you note back.
Forwarded from Al F.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Thousands on the streets of Dublin right now. Govt voting on the making the EU Covid pass law for all 'relevent' indoor businesses. Compliance officers & emergency cessation orders already written into the bill.
Irish government has tonight voted to allow only vaxxed people to dine in restaurants indoors while the unvaxxed will have to stay outside
Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
WILL THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE RESPOND TO FRANCE'S PUSH TOWARD MANDATORY VACCINATION?

In 1997 the Council of Europe issued a declaration, under a lengthy title: Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Chapter II, “Consent,” Article 5, “General Rule,” stands out as especially relevant: “An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the person concerned has given free and informed consent to it”. Note that this does not entertain the debate over whether “experimental” vs. “investigational” should be the appropriate term. It simply refers to any “intervention” in the health field, regardless of the label one uses for that intervention.

In addition Article 5 states: “This person shall beforehand be given appropriate information as to the purpose and nature of the intervention as well as on its consequences and risks”. While we certainly are aware of the purpose of the intervention in the case of injections to counter Covid-19, clearly not many understand the nature of the injectables, nor are all of the consequences and risks known yet—therefore, informed consent for any injection, no matter how seemingly voluntary, can be said to have been “informed” because not all of the information is yet known or made public. Under such conditions, no informed consent has been possible, for any anyone.

Article 5 also adds: “The person concerned may freely withdraw consent at any time”—thus any mandatory vaccination campaign would be a violation, since it removes the right to withdraw consent.

Has there been a "Frexit," and we missed the news?

#covid19 #France #EU #mandatory_vaccination #VaccinePassports
The label "anti-vaxxer" by definition can't be used against those who oppose injections which are not vaccines. Anything which does not prevent infection or transmission is NOT a vaccine. Therefore those protesting the jabs are NOT anti-vaxxers. Full stop.