"My relevant experience is as a district education director responsible for integration of immunocompromised, profoundly disabled, undocumented, Autistic, and behaviorally challenged students under full ADA, IDEA, and OSHA compliance, with a background in hazardous environs 2/

PPE applications, which includes which respirators work when and why.

My experience grants me the capacity, for instance, to understand specifically how none of you sitting before us today are protected against Covid size particulates, nor are you protecting others - but you 3/

know this already, don’t you?
It is critical information to consider that there are ZERO efficacy standards for child size masks. You are requiring untested, unregulated apparatuses which restrict breathing, cause increased carbon dioxide, and are a petri dish of secondary 4/

pathogen directly in front of oral/nasal mucosa.

You tell me if you think this sounds like something that would pass an ethics review board. We're going to take a bunch of kids and put them in this apparatus, ok? They'll be in it for 8 hours per day, up to 12 if they are 5/

in extended day programs. We will not ask for medical clearance or medical consent, but this apparatus will cause deoxygenation and hypercapnia, and children being the sanitary creatures that they are, will drop them, wear them into restrooms where they pick up fecal matter 6/

and other pathogen from toilet plumes. I hope each of you who have worn a mask in a public restroom today recoil in horror at the realization of what you’re breathing - tasting, even - all day long. Kids wear them all day. To be exempt, they must fight tooth and nail and face 7/

rampant rejection. Would this pass an ethics review in your opinion? Of course it wouldn't, but here we are, and this is what you are doing to children in this school system every day, even our truly immunocompromised, in unregulated, unsafe garbage which exacerbates the 8/

spread of airborne pathogen. But we're all in this together, right?
Cloth and surgical masks are expressly non-mitigating for airborne pathogen. Covid has a minimum particle size of .06 microns, which if part of a larger cluster still easily falls within the radically behaving 9

particulate range. Add in plosive force, which is the varying outward respiratory pressure, and you have much like water through a garden hose on the mister setting - droplet into aerosol - where the tighter the fit, the greater the pressure of fine particulates in an outward 10/

plume, effectively taking what falls in a predictable 6 foot arc and sending it an 18-20 foot trajectory, remaining aloft for hours in enclosed spaces. 90% of exhaled emitted particulates fall within the radically behaving particulate range - what you have is truly an airborne pathogen. "

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1387378962406461440.html?s=09

Here is another nice one. Sample of uninfected people in Singapore showed 50% had T cell immunity.

"Our team also tested uninfected healthy individuals and found SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in more than 50 percent of them. This could be due to cross-reactive immunity obtained from exposure to other coronaviruses, such as those causing the common cold, or presently unknown animal coronaviruses.  "

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200716101536.htm

I agree entirely. I asked around my network & thought in relation to my own situation. The consistent barrier is censorship. We are used, through history, to seeing sometimes very small numbers of determined individuals making a difference. But when one’s ideas, conclusions, analysis & even human outrage is subject to the whims of the state, we have a problem of an entirely different dimension.

As a former commercial scientist, I have absolutely no idea about public campaigning.

I’ve deliberately offered my insights in the hope that someone or a group with campaigning skills would be provided with the evidence that they required in order to persuade others of the deception(s).

I’ve been disappointed that literally no one has approached me in that spirit, not once.

Some appear to assume I’d be doing that, too. I’m hopelessly unsuited to such a role (essentially politics). I’m neither physically robust enough to do something like this & I’m constitutionally a poor fit to anything like that. I find it tough to hold my tongue.

So a leader who can & wants to lead is minimally required, in my opinion.

Anyone who comes aboard, or has today’s equivalent of their own Man-O-War, will find a willing crew to cover all the staffing needs of an aggressive campaigning group.

I’ve thought about this. Imagine you’re running a multi day table top simulation. The leadership operating what I’m sure they considered an outlandish scenario would have had much thinking time to answer this question:

“What measures & responses should be expected from the public at large? How can we ensure that these are neutralised such that none of these succeed?”

I came to to not very surprising, but nevertheless useful, conclusion that pretty much ANYTHING we have done or plan to do, if it really fits in the “obvious & expected” category of responses, my working assumption is that the crooks have already neutralised it.

Perhaps the most likely breakthrough would come from moving down a path which is not predicted? A course of action that they are most unlikely to have anticipated?

Not that I know what & how. Just bringing a non-politicians eye view to the scene.

I’m open to trying almost anything. Despite my best efforts & in spite of the kind & uplifting words if many, the harsh reality is I’ve not altered the trajectory or timing of anything at all.

Best wishes
Mike

Robin,
I agree that natural immunity and even that from the vaccines (assuming they work as claimed) will easily cope with variants.
A key point GVB has repeatedly failed to answer for is this: in the event that a variant had ‘rolled the dice’ so luckily that it evaded my immune system, it will not have evaded yours. Most people don’t know that we each create immunity using a unique combination of recognition points about the pathogen. That’s called our immune repertoire. If a variant bypasses my repertoire, yours, being different, will continue to detect variants & defend you against them.
In other words, immune escape is a phenomenon that initially only impacts individuals & not communities.
Cheers,
Mike

The only way to beat a corrupt machine with tentacles stretching everywhere is with a constantly growing grassroots movement.

The rally in London shows your message, and others, is getting through. I remember your column in the Mail last year, the comments were overwhelmingly positive - good examples that folk do respond to the message, it's just not usually allowed a platform.

Would be willing to wager you / Gupta / Heneghan (etc) wouldn't be that far off the govt scientists in a public vote of 'Covid confidence', despite them having all the propaganda machinations behind them.

The spike protein has gone to meet its maker..or has it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeIrGrIv7eE

INDIA: CONCLUSIVE PROOF THAT IT IS THE JAB.
(A MUTANT WOULD TEST +)

Yogurt. Not jabs.
https://greatgameindia.com/yogurt-cytokine-storm-covid-19/

Didier Raoult. Here is a piece in Paris
Match from May 2020 where in response to a question about whether or not
he is working on a vaccine for covid-19, he says (DeepL translation from
the French):

"Not at all! Vaccines are not always the right solution. Finding a
vaccine for a disease that is not immunizing... it's even a silly
challenge. Nearly 30 billion dollars have been spent on the HIV
vaccine, look at the result! This is not a laboratory war, but a war of
intelligence. When we don't know how to manage an infectious disease,
we get the vaccine trick! It is already difficult to vaccinate
correctly against the flu, but against a new virus... Honestly, the
chance that a vaccine for an emerging disease will become a public
health tool is close to zero. There may be surprises, but I'm
skeptical."

Entretien exclusif avec Didier Raoult : 'Je suis un renégat

https://www.parismatch.com/Actu/Sante/Professeur-Didier-Raoult-Je-suis-un-renegat-1683722

Florida will fine any business or school $5,000 each time it requires a “vaccine passport,” or proof of COVID-19 vaccination, for entry or participation

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/senate-ok-needed-to-send-florida-vaccine-passport-ban-to-desantis-desk

UPDATE ON THE “STOP MASKS 😷 IN SCHOOLS” HIGH COURT CASE (UK)

💣 At the High Court hearing today, 30 April 2021, it was revealed to the Court that neither the Tapton School Academy Trust (which runs 4 secondary schools) nor the government had conducted ANY ‼️ assessment of the risk of harms from requiring children to wear masks in schools.

💣 At the same time the Court received unchallenged evidence that wearing masks could result in causing pulmonary fibrosis ‼️ , being "among the worst diseases that can be suffered or witnessed. It kills exceedingly slowly, by ever-thickening matrix formation, a kind of scar tissue, obstructing the alveoli and reducing their air exchange. The illness worsens over time, and suffocates the victim very gradually. Nothing is available to the sufferer from conventional medicine."

💣 Also unchallenged was evidence of psychological harm suffered by children because of the pressure upon them to wear masks and the need to conform to the authority of teachers and their peers.

Against this background, the child (whose name and school remain subject to a Court anonymity order) asked the Court for an order stopping the school encouraging mask-wearing by children.

Roger Ter Haar QC (Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) has reserved his judgment but indicated he expects to provide his decision in writing by next Wednesday 05 May 2021.

The evidence is here, a must read for all parents:

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/stop-masks-in-schools/?fbclid=IwAR34LpFj2fl_YadkzaJa0Y9zLd76_rTs0k_Q6dpQ-43OyCKKI5oiFIsFT1I

Why are newspapers in India pushing this implausible narrative of mutants evading PCR tests? What illnesses may they be covering up by calling them "negative Covid"? What did they roll out in last few months? Mystery..

INDIA: "On March 30, the Brazilian drug regulator, Anvisa, published a report listing a litany of quality problems with Bharat Biotech’s manufacturing plant for its inactivated COVID vaccine, Covaxin. These problems included insufficient measures to ensure that the SARS-COV-2 virus was completely killed"..

https://www.thequint.com/amp/story/coronavirus/explained-why-is-cdsco-silent-on-brazils-report-on-bharat-biotech-plant

OPEN LETTER TO THE WHO

"Dr. Shi Zhengli has stated that Wuhan Institute of Virology virus databases were taken
offline during the pandemic. However the key bat virus database was taken offline in
September 2019, three months before the official start of the outbreak.

Dr. Shi Zhengli and Dr. Yuan Zhiming have both stated that ‘all staff tested negative
for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies’ at the WIV in March 2020. Yet, this is statistically unlikely
(roughly less than one chance in a billion) given that there are more than 590 staff and
students at the WIV and about 4.4% of the Wuhan urban population tested positive at
around that time. Even if only 85 people were tested, the chance of no positive test
would still be less than 4%.
➢ How can this contradiction be explained?
➢ Can Chinese authorities make available the anonymized raw data of these tests
and the test samples for further examination?"

Open-Letter-to-the-World-Health-Organization-and-the-Members-of-its-Executive-Board-1.pdf

This week’s data included three reports of deaths among teens under age 18, including two 15-year-olds and one 16-year-old who died unexpectedly from a blood clot 11 days after receiving her first Pfizer dose. https://bit.ly/3xC0ql3

"Of course there is another aspect to the study sample size of the "huge" 43,000 Pfizer study. At 0.1% prevalence of covid (or less) the probability that the risk of ADE will be tested is low.

If the risk of ADE was 5% you would only see it in 2 patients in their study.... 

That risk would be presented as 2/43,000 and the vaccine would be considered "safe" because the risk of ADE was so low.

But it would still be far higher than the risk of an unvaccinated person dying of #SARSCOV2 in a post-covid environment. 

It's a numbers game for @pfizer and you can guarantee that the numbers will look favourable for them.

Especially the numbers in their bank account."

https://archive.is/2020.11.15-091419/https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1327805882063720448.html

Sheep should think a little bit, refer to history. 1976 swine flu