"Of course there is another aspect to the study sample size of the "huge" 43,000 Pfizer study. At 0.1% prevalence of covid (or less) the probability that the risk of ADE will be tested is low.
If the risk of ADE was 5% you would only see it in 2 patients in their study....
That risk would be presented as 2/43,000 and the vaccine would be considered "safe" because the risk of ADE was so low.
But it would still be far higher than the risk of an unvaccinated person dying of #SARSCOV2 in a post-covid environment.
It's a numbers game for @pfizer and you can guarantee that the numbers will look favourable for them.
Especially the numbers in their bank account."
https://archive.is/2020.11.15-091419/https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1327805882063720448.html
If the risk of ADE was 5% you would only see it in 2 patients in their study....
That risk would be presented as 2/43,000 and the vaccine would be considered "safe" because the risk of ADE was so low.
But it would still be far higher than the risk of an unvaccinated person dying of #SARSCOV2 in a post-covid environment.
It's a numbers game for @pfizer and you can guarantee that the numbers will look favourable for them.
Especially the numbers in their bank account."
https://archive.is/2020.11.15-091419/https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1327805882063720448.html
archive.is
Thread by @Arkancideisreal on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
archived 15 Nov 2020 09:14:19 UTC
⚗🦠 LAB LEAK SMOKING GUN: 🔫
"Excellent layperson explanation of the relevance of the BsmBI purchase proposed in DEFUSE by
@john_bumblebee, translated from Dutch:
I have to explain this because I don't think the interested layman realizes how incredibly important this find is. In fact, this is finding a gun with the fingerprints of the perpetrator in a murder. In October 2022, @tony_vandongen @VBruttel and @WashburneAlex published a preprint, in which they described a number of striking features of #SARSCoV2 . There were a number of cutting sites in the virus's genome that ensured that the virus could be cut into pieces making it possible to easily exchange them with another gene, as if it were a module. Moreover, these cutting sites were much more regularly distributed across the genome than in comparable viruses such as BANAL52 and RaTG13. This would fit well with a 'reverse genetics' system, which allows one to quickly and easily create an artificial virus. Because you could easily exchange each of those six pieces for another piece from a different virus. Including the part containing the receptor-binding domain and the furin cleavage site. The latter is unique to SARSCoV2 and does not occur in any other sarbecovirus. They had the entire clan of the zoonati thrown at them, with the utmost nonsense, but the conclusions still stood. The entire makeup of SARSCoV2 could very well fit a 'reverse genetics system'. One point of criticism was why the trio focused on only two of those molecular scissors, while there are many more. This was due to the fact that Ralph Baric published an article in 2017 using those scissors, thus writing a manual, as it were, for this reverse genetics system. I wrote about this before in @AndereKrant.
https://deanderekrant.nl/nieuws/steeds-meer-bewijs-sars-cov-2-virus-kwam-uit-lab-2022-11-18
Now we go to DEFUSE, the application to the American defense organization DARPA by
@EcoHealthNYC. It was proposed to incorporate a furin cleavage site into coronaviruses. What now turns out? The DEFUSE application proposes to be able to cut artificial viruses into SIX parts. And which molecular scissors did they order for that? That's right: the two pairs of scissors that the trio of VanDongen, Bruttel and Washburne discussed. In other words, not only did DEFUSE propose building a furin cleavage site into coronaviruses, they also described exactly how they wanted to do this and using which molecular scissors. And exactly that method fits seamlessly with what SARSCoV2 looks like. This is the gun. With the fingerprints. Literally. Apparently something has happened, and Bruttel has shown something that was not yet intended to be published. Emily Kopp's account from the
@USRightToKnow has strangely disappeared. We'll see how this turns out. But this is 'pretty much case closed'."
https://twitter.com/john_bumblebee/status/1747928491478135049
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
"Excellent layperson explanation of the relevance of the BsmBI purchase proposed in DEFUSE by
@john_bumblebee, translated from Dutch:
I have to explain this because I don't think the interested layman realizes how incredibly important this find is. In fact, this is finding a gun with the fingerprints of the perpetrator in a murder. In October 2022, @tony_vandongen @VBruttel and @WashburneAlex published a preprint, in which they described a number of striking features of #SARSCoV2 . There were a number of cutting sites in the virus's genome that ensured that the virus could be cut into pieces making it possible to easily exchange them with another gene, as if it were a module. Moreover, these cutting sites were much more regularly distributed across the genome than in comparable viruses such as BANAL52 and RaTG13. This would fit well with a 'reverse genetics' system, which allows one to quickly and easily create an artificial virus. Because you could easily exchange each of those six pieces for another piece from a different virus. Including the part containing the receptor-binding domain and the furin cleavage site. The latter is unique to SARSCoV2 and does not occur in any other sarbecovirus. They had the entire clan of the zoonati thrown at them, with the utmost nonsense, but the conclusions still stood. The entire makeup of SARSCoV2 could very well fit a 'reverse genetics system'. One point of criticism was why the trio focused on only two of those molecular scissors, while there are many more. This was due to the fact that Ralph Baric published an article in 2017 using those scissors, thus writing a manual, as it were, for this reverse genetics system. I wrote about this before in @AndereKrant.
https://deanderekrant.nl/nieuws/steeds-meer-bewijs-sars-cov-2-virus-kwam-uit-lab-2022-11-18
Now we go to DEFUSE, the application to the American defense organization DARPA by
@EcoHealthNYC. It was proposed to incorporate a furin cleavage site into coronaviruses. What now turns out? The DEFUSE application proposes to be able to cut artificial viruses into SIX parts. And which molecular scissors did they order for that? That's right: the two pairs of scissors that the trio of VanDongen, Bruttel and Washburne discussed. In other words, not only did DEFUSE propose building a furin cleavage site into coronaviruses, they also described exactly how they wanted to do this and using which molecular scissors. And exactly that method fits seamlessly with what SARSCoV2 looks like. This is the gun. With the fingerprints. Literally. Apparently something has happened, and Bruttel has shown something that was not yet intended to be published. Emily Kopp's account from the
@USRightToKnow has strangely disappeared. We'll see how this turns out. But this is 'pretty much case closed'."
https://twitter.com/john_bumblebee/status/1747928491478135049
➡️ Boost RobinMG 🚀
De Andere Krant
De Andere Krant - Steeds meer bewijs: SARS-CoV-2-virus kwam uit lab: Van onze redactie, Jan Bonte
Van onze redactie, Jan Bonte: Dubieuze rol virologen Erasmus
👍37❤11🔥5😁1🤔1