I’d be interested in GVB’s response to my characterisation so far, because I genuinely don’t understand his narrative at all & I have tried, having listened to two of his long form interviews.

Is he saying that the variants of SARS-CoV-2 are much more different from the original sequence than I’m relating? If yes, please provide a link to this. I’m not seeing any such larger changes in the literature.

Or, is he saying that a change as tiny as I’m talking about (0.3% or so in the primary sequence) is enough to no longer be recognised as a pathogen we’ve seen before? If so, perhaps he’d like to comment on how that could be & in particular, I’d be very interested in his thoughts on these two papers?

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.26.115832v1

This paper by Le Bert et al (2020) shows that those who recovered from infection with SARS in 2003 still retain good T-cell immune recognition 17y later AND also recognise SARS-CoV-2, which they’d NOT encountered before, Now, that’s cross protection & these two viruses differ by more than 20%. Rather destroys any argument that the tiny extent of drift of SARS-CoV-2 requires the planetary obsession of which GVB is part, does it not?


https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266637912100015X
This paper by Tarke et al (2021) shows that a large number of T-cell epitopes are selected & form part of the repertoire in immunity (there’s another set of smaller, overlapping but non-identical set of epitopes against which antibodies are raised). The authors themselves conclude that their findings remove concern that small changes in the virus, such as we’ve seen so far, will enable immune escape.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.27.433180v1
The same group also showed that subjects who’d survived infection by SARS-COV-2 or had been vaccinated ALL recognised ALL the variants which the investigators had available.

By the way, I’d be be interested in his reactions to this in depth review on the clinical efficacy of ivermectin. Its been subject to ruthless censorship for at least SIX MONTHS, resulting in countless avoidable deaths. I argue that if it, along with the other useful treatments, (which have been beautifully summarised in a protocol for targeted, sequential, multi drug treatment of covid19, which Dr Peter McCullough & others have drafted & posted on the website of the American Association of Physicians & Surgeons), were more widely appreciated & APPLIED in clinical practise, we could control covid19 much better than we do now, and CANCEL the Emergency Use Authorisations for all the experimental, gene-based, spike protein inducing ‘vaccines’. Does GVB agree, or is he interested only in peddling further, also experimental vaccines?

Ivermectin review:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/pdf/ajt-28-e299.pdf

McCullough et al multi drug treatment of covid19:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.28.21250706v1.full

And also:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33387997/

Bottom line for me is that the extent of variation in SARS-COV-2 simply isn’t concerning. There’s no hint of immune escape nor would it be expected, based on both theoretically & empirically.
If the picture changes, so too will my view.

This means THERES NO JUSTIFICATION WHATSOEVER FOR VACCINES AGAINST VARIANTS!!

Anyone know what’s in those “3rd jab vials”?

I’m often asked “So why do we require new vaccines against influenza each year?”

This is because the way flu changes it’s structure is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT from the slow, antigenic drift we observe in SARS-COV-2.
Instead, flu can undergo reassortment or antigenic SHIFT, exchanging whole sections of genetic information. In terms of the movement analogy, for flu, it’s as if it has its ‘seven league boots on’. It can combine these methods & in a year, evolve so much that, when it cones round again in the next season, it can actually present to our immune systems as if it was a new pathogen entirely. It doesn’t always do this and has been reasonably stable in recent years.

Another one from Dr Mike Yeadon ⬇️

"Just look at this article, by an anonymous author, claiming to “debunk common myths.
Just like governments main narrative points, with one, trivial exception, it is ALL LIES.
Please allow me to dismantle their PROPAGANDA;

1. ‘Only anti bacterial soap will kill the virus’.

I don’t understand what their point is here.
Fair to say that the transmission route is opaque.
I don’t recall any published literature, demonstrating beyond reasonable doubt, what routes of infection have been proven. But manual contact, then face touching, is a frequently seen path, together with aerosols (again, though, this latter is assumed rather than demonstrated.
For the manual contact route to be important, it would be expected to easy to show presence of the virus. Does anyone and psoers proving that?
For the aerosol route to be important, surely we should easily detect it on air filters in hospital wards filled with ill, symptomatic patients with covid19. Last time I checked, I was surprised not to find papers with these findings. Can anyone help me with a couple of unequivocal findings.

2. Young people aren’t at risk of getting Covid-19.

Well, this is a straw man, nobody thinks this. What they think is that healthy young people don’t get ILL with this virus. In the main, this is true. Virtually no such people have even died ‘with covid19’, let alone of it.

3. It’s less dangerous than the flu.

For those under 70y & lacking serious chronic illnesses, this is true. They’re lying again, trying to pressure young people to accept vaccination that they don’t need.

4. Masks don’t keep you safer.

ANOTHER LIE! There is no literature showing that masks clearly reduce respiratory virus transmission. Throw your masks in the bin. They’re tools to keep you anxious only.

5. Vitamin C can help you.

Again, isn’t this another straw man? I don’t recall this ‘therapeutic’ being commonly proposed. Perhaps they’re trying to persuade you that “there is nothing but vaccination” to protect you, whereas numerous treatments do beneficially alter outlines, including Vit D, HCQ, Ivermectin, steroids, zinc, certain antibiotics.

What an awful article."

Vitamin C will help: https://c19vitaminc.com/

As for aerosols, it is actually age and body mass index related, the older the age the more aerosols spread:

"We note that all volunteers of under 26 years of age and all subjects under 22 BMI [body mass index] were low spreaders of exhaled bioaerosol."
https://www.pnas.org/content/118/8/e2021830118.long

I received many emails from a Reuters journalist asking me to talk about Mike Yeadon. I did not say one word. It is now clear why. Read the whole thread: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1393659818708144129.html

"Pfizer board member James C Smith was CEO of Thomson Reuters Corporation until 2020, and is currently chairman of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. Reuters has failed to disclose this conflict of interest in all of their very favorable coverage of Pfizer & their vaccine. >>>
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1393659818708144129.html

Robin,
Aminolipids are apparently required to dose animals & humans with mRNA sequences & have them enter tissues & cells, which is a minimum requirement in order to have any chance to express some biological effects.
Yet certain aminolipids were also recognised as being too toxic for repeated injections. Presumably “too toxic” even in human illnesses like cancer?
If so, then even further away from safe to administer to billions of people at least twice (& potentially a great deal more often than just twice).
I’ve just stumbled across this paper in Cell, a prestigious journal, from 2018.
Note how close to the emergency use authorisation of a “vaccine” based in similar technology.

The frightening quote in the abstract:
“ This effort has resulted in the first example of the ability to safely repeat dose mRNA-containing lipid nanoparticles in non-human primate at therapeutically relevant levels.“

So, first time ever in 2018?

Mike

At least on this channel and group, Everybody Knows..

"Everybody knows that the boat is leaking
Everybody knows that the captain lied
Everybody got this broken feeling
Like their father or their dog just died

And everybody knows that the Plague is coming
Everybody knows that it's moving fast
Everybody knows that the naked man and woman
Are just a shining artifact of the past
Everybody knows the scene is dead
But there's gonna be a meter on your bed
That will disclose
What everybody knows"

Leonard Cohen

https://youtu.be/mnfoUJxI2dM

Someone tried to burn down the Christian pastor's house in Canada, Artur Pawlowski, who refused to cancel mass during the lockdowns.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q40f6-1GsxQ

This rates in the top 5 most important clips from the entire scamdemic so far. r McCullough drops so many truth bombs here - please share this after watching it.

I'm not an "anti-lockdown activist". I am simply pro-normal physical daily life. And sovereignty over one's own body like we always had. Strange that wanting the old normal life back is now considered as some kind of extremely radical revolutionary position..

It’s just...

Here is the full interview of Tucker Carlson with Dr. Peter McCullough.
PLEASE - SHARE IT WITH EVERYONE YOU KNOW !!!

They just want to save us folks..

"Big pharma executives mocked 'pillbillies' in emails"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9586551/Big-pharma-executives-mocked-pillbillies-emails.html

PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus

Almost 1 MILLION signatures
https://lifepetitions.com/petition/no-mandatory-vaccine-for-covid-19

THE AGENDA: THE GREAT RESET & THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION

I put this video together, with a person in mind who knows either nothing, or very little about the Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Please share.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/43M73OQOb2cH/