"If someone does not wish to share their details, provides incorrect information or chooses not to scan the NHS QR code

Hospitality venues must take reasonable steps to refuse entry to a customer or visitor who does not provide their name and contact details or who has not scanned the NHS QR code.
Hospitality venues should verify that an individual has checked in using the QR code by reviewing the individual’s phone screen. This is not necessary if they have already provided their contact details.
Venues in other settings do not need to refuse entry but should strongly encourage customers and visitors to scan the official NHS QR code poster or provide their contact details in order to support NHS Test and Trace. They should advise customers and visitors that this information will only be used where necessary to help stop the spread of COVID-19.
If in the rare case that a customer or visitor becomes unruly, you should follow your own security procedures. This may include calling the police if you feel the individual poses a risk to yourself or others.
The accuracy of the information provided will be the responsibility of the individual who provides it. You do not have to verify an individual’s identity for NHS Test and Trace purposes, and we advise against doing so except where organisations have a reasonable suspicion that customer or visitor details are incorrect. You may refuse to allow entry if you have reason to believe the details are inaccurate.

Failure to comply

Collecting contact details and maintaining records for NHS Test and Trace is a legal requirement and failure to comply is punishable by a fine:

first fixed penalty: £1,000

second fixed penalty: £2,000

third fixed penalty: £4,000

any further penalty notice: £10,000

The person responsible for the organisation is liable. This could be the owner, proprietor or manager with overall responsibility of the organisation, business or service.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/maintaining-records-of-staff-customers-and-visitors-to-support-nhs-test-and-trace#history

Covid Policy Tactics Were Borrowed from the Vietnam War

EXTRACTED KEY POINTS:

▶️ justifications for starting the War and the Lockdowns were similarly questionable
▶️ the stated mission was changed after intervention began
▶️ last far longer than governments had suggested in their original rollouts
▶️ dubious experts who were/are the faces and drivers of government policy
▶️ government officials misleadingly used fake statistics to advance their agendas
▶️ the government mistakenly relied on human confinement to eliminate elusive foes
▶️ the experts ignored the larger context of the challenges presented, thus causing vast, unnecessary collateral damage
▶️ governments failed to recognize the limits and costs of intervention
▶️ decision-makers unjustly and evilly shifted burdens from those who had already lived a long time to a younger generation who had the most vital life to lose
▶️ striving to fulfill such unrealistic pledges in these parallel situations cost many people dearly
▶️ zero tolerance
▶️ created economic winners and losers
▶️ the more affluent have been insulated from the suffering experienced by those who live hand to mouth
▶️ the government implemented technical solutions that were falsely touted as game-changers
▶️ governments also failed to consider the longer-term effects of their drastic interventions
▶️ government printed so much money that it will cause economy-distorting inflation that will stress individuals and families for decades
▶️ Partisan politics strongly tainted both the Vietnam and Coronavirus responses
▶️ Presidential history might repeat itself in the pandemic Era
▶️ Eventually, a consensus will emerge that the Coronavirus response was, like the Vietnam War, a colossal, politically-driven, panic-driven, intergenerationally unjust, deeply destructive overreaction that caused far more harm than they prevented

CONTINUE HERE:
https://brownstone.org/articles/covid-policy-tactics-were-borrowed-from-the-vietnam-war/

#covid19 #COIN #Vietnam #history #myth_making #lockdowns #Pandemicism