Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
CHALLENGE THE "PANDEMIC"
Further to the last post, it has become abundantly clear through the many cases lost in Canadian courts, that judges routinely respond: "Well, it's a pandemic, so..."
As long as legal challenges fail to assault and dismantle this basic, fundamental, core belief, they will continue to fail.
We need to ask:
❓What "pandemic"?
❓Who has the authority and the right to declare a pandemic?
❓On what basis can one claim that there is or was a pandemic?
❓What is it about a given pandemic that necessitates certain specific measures?
Again, too many on our side work with the assumption that we are in fact "in a pandemic". Drop that term, as much as you have dropped "vaccine". When the "pandemic" was first declared in Quebec, there was zero evidence on the ground to warrant that classification.
#covid19 #Pandemicism #legality #resistance
Further to the last post, it has become abundantly clear through the many cases lost in Canadian courts, that judges routinely respond: "Well, it's a pandemic, so..."
As long as legal challenges fail to assault and dismantle this basic, fundamental, core belief, they will continue to fail.
We need to ask:
❓What "pandemic"?
❓Who has the authority and the right to declare a pandemic?
❓On what basis can one claim that there is or was a pandemic?
❓What is it about a given pandemic that necessitates certain specific measures?
Again, too many on our side work with the assumption that we are in fact "in a pandemic". Drop that term, as much as you have dropped "vaccine". When the "pandemic" was first declared in Quebec, there was zero evidence on the ground to warrant that classification.
#covid19 #Pandemicism #legality #resistance
Telegram
ZERO ANTHROPOLOGY
CANADIAN LAWYERS PRESENTING AT THE CANADIAN COVID CARE ALLIANCE:
THE LAW IS NOT WHAT YOU THOUGHT, NOR IS CANADA
A presentation at the meeting of the CCCA tonight, by lawyers Bruce Pardy and Lisa Bildy, was deeply sobering for most in attendance (some chose…
THE LAW IS NOT WHAT YOU THOUGHT, NOR IS CANADA
A presentation at the meeting of the CCCA tonight, by lawyers Bruce Pardy and Lisa Bildy, was deeply sobering for most in attendance (some chose…
Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
COSTA RICA'S NEW PRESIDENT STRIKES BACK AGAINST ILLEGAL VACCINE MANDATES
In a stunning press conference on Weds., August 3, 2022, Costa Rica's newly elected President, Rodrigo Chaves, accompanied by Minister of Health, Joselyn Chacón, repeatedly denounced mandatory "vaccination" as not only illegal, but against key recommendations made by none other than the World Health Organization) and the Pan-American Health Organization. Sensitive to how hostile media and political opponents had portrayed them, the two underscored the fact that they were following WHO/PAHO guidelines, and were not "anti-vaxxers" who are "anti-science". They showed that the National Vaccination and Epidemiology Commission (CNVE) had not only broken the law, but that the members of the commission occupied their positions illegally. The President declared: "Costa Rica's people are not cattle, that you beat with a piece of wood and force to get vaccinated".
#covid19 #CostaRica #democracy #technocracy #coup #legality #mandatory_vaccination
In a stunning press conference on Weds., August 3, 2022, Costa Rica's newly elected President, Rodrigo Chaves, accompanied by Minister of Health, Joselyn Chacón, repeatedly denounced mandatory "vaccination" as not only illegal, but against key recommendations made by none other than the World Health Organization) and the Pan-American Health Organization. Sensitive to how hostile media and political opponents had portrayed them, the two underscored the fact that they were following WHO/PAHO guidelines, and were not "anti-vaxxers" who are "anti-science". They showed that the National Vaccination and Epidemiology Commission (CNVE) had not only broken the law, but that the members of the commission occupied their positions illegally. The President declared: "Costa Rica's people are not cattle, that you beat with a piece of wood and force to get vaccinated".
#covid19 #CostaRica #democracy #technocracy #coup #legality #mandatory_vaccination
Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
Federal court strikes down Biden admin’s online censorship collusion with Big Tech
The ruling limits Big Tech and the Biden administration's collusion to silence contrarian views.
EXTRACTS:
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals curtailed the ability of the federal government to work together with Big Tech companies to censor free speech.
The September 8 ruling forbids President Biden’s team from using companies such as Facebook and X, formerly known as Twitter, to act as a censor to advance his agenda and prevent speech that questions the safety and efficacy of COVID shots or raises concerns about the integrity of the 2020 election.
In one instance, a Biden staffer quickly convinced Instagram to remove an account that parodied Dr. Anthony Fauci. Plaintiffs included silenced contrarians, such as Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and Dr. Martin Kulldorff....
The September 8 ruling resulted in a modified prohibition.
“Defendants, and their employees and agents, shall take no actions, formal or informal, directly or indirectly, to coerce or significantly encourage social-media companies to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce, including through altering their algorithms, posted social-media content containing protected free speech,” a new injunction against some Biden officials now states.
“That includes, but is not limited to, compelling the platforms to act, such as by intimating that some form of punishment will follow a failure to comply with any request, or supervising, directing, or otherwise meaningfully controlling the social-media companies’ decision-making processes,” the injunction continues.
Those officials include the Surgeon General and the White House, which were guilty of “coercive” statements, according to the three-judge panel.
The ruling also cited the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for encouraging social media censorship.
“In short, when the platforms acted, they did so in response to the FBI’s inherent authority and based on internal policies influenced by FBI officials,” the opinion stated. “Taking those facts together, we find the platforms’ decisions were significantly encouraged and coerced by the FBI.”...
“In an unprecedented, historic decision, the Fifth Circuit has recognized that the conduct of the White House, CDC, Surgeon General, and FBI violated Americans’ First Amendment rights,” attorney Jenin Younes stated. “The government cannot coerce or encourage social media companies to censor views it dislikes. This decision vindicates the Plaintiffs’ rights and protects the free speech of all Americans.”
“The New Civil Liberties Alliance celebrates this landmark victory for our clients, Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff and Aaron Kheriaty, and Ms. Jill Hines,” the group stated. “At the government’s request, the Fifth Circuit stayed the order for 10 days to give the government time to petition for a writ of certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court.”
“The Biden Administration’s years-long censorship campaign has suppressed perspectives contradicting government-approved views on hotly disputed topics like whether natural immunity to Covid-19 exists, Covid-19 vaccine concerns, the virus’s origins, and mask mandate efficacy,” the group stated.
“The vast, coordinated censorship campaign has silenced public voices including influential doctors and scientists. Drs. Bhattacharya, Kulldorff and Kheriaty, and Ms. Hines have all been blacklisted, shadow-banned, de-boosted, throttled, and censored on social media.” /
CONTINUE HERE:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/federal-court-strikes-down-biden-admins-online-censorship-collusion-with-big-tech/
#ThreeEleven #Biden #dictatorship #censorship #CDC #FDA #FBI #legality
The ruling limits Big Tech and the Biden administration's collusion to silence contrarian views.
EXTRACTS:
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals curtailed the ability of the federal government to work together with Big Tech companies to censor free speech.
The September 8 ruling forbids President Biden’s team from using companies such as Facebook and X, formerly known as Twitter, to act as a censor to advance his agenda and prevent speech that questions the safety and efficacy of COVID shots or raises concerns about the integrity of the 2020 election.
In one instance, a Biden staffer quickly convinced Instagram to remove an account that parodied Dr. Anthony Fauci. Plaintiffs included silenced contrarians, such as Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and Dr. Martin Kulldorff....
The September 8 ruling resulted in a modified prohibition.
“Defendants, and their employees and agents, shall take no actions, formal or informal, directly or indirectly, to coerce or significantly encourage social-media companies to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce, including through altering their algorithms, posted social-media content containing protected free speech,” a new injunction against some Biden officials now states.
“That includes, but is not limited to, compelling the platforms to act, such as by intimating that some form of punishment will follow a failure to comply with any request, or supervising, directing, or otherwise meaningfully controlling the social-media companies’ decision-making processes,” the injunction continues.
Those officials include the Surgeon General and the White House, which were guilty of “coercive” statements, according to the three-judge panel.
The ruling also cited the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for encouraging social media censorship.
“In short, when the platforms acted, they did so in response to the FBI’s inherent authority and based on internal policies influenced by FBI officials,” the opinion stated. “Taking those facts together, we find the platforms’ decisions were significantly encouraged and coerced by the FBI.”...
“In an unprecedented, historic decision, the Fifth Circuit has recognized that the conduct of the White House, CDC, Surgeon General, and FBI violated Americans’ First Amendment rights,” attorney Jenin Younes stated. “The government cannot coerce or encourage social media companies to censor views it dislikes. This decision vindicates the Plaintiffs’ rights and protects the free speech of all Americans.”
“The New Civil Liberties Alliance celebrates this landmark victory for our clients, Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff and Aaron Kheriaty, and Ms. Jill Hines,” the group stated. “At the government’s request, the Fifth Circuit stayed the order for 10 days to give the government time to petition for a writ of certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court.”
“The Biden Administration’s years-long censorship campaign has suppressed perspectives contradicting government-approved views on hotly disputed topics like whether natural immunity to Covid-19 exists, Covid-19 vaccine concerns, the virus’s origins, and mask mandate efficacy,” the group stated.
“The vast, coordinated censorship campaign has silenced public voices including influential doctors and scientists. Drs. Bhattacharya, Kulldorff and Kheriaty, and Ms. Hines have all been blacklisted, shadow-banned, de-boosted, throttled, and censored on social media.” /
CONTINUE HERE:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/federal-court-strikes-down-biden-admins-online-censorship-collusion-with-big-tech/
#ThreeEleven #Biden #dictatorship #censorship #CDC #FDA #FBI #legality
LifeSite
Federal court strikes down Biden admin's online censorship collusion with Big Tech - LifeSite
The ruling limits Big Tech and the Biden administration's collusion to silence contrarian views.
👏74👍16❤8🔥3