Forwarded from Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel
🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 Warning Against Triumphalism Over US-Israeli "Failed" War on Iran
▪️Despite apparent weakness exposed amid US-Israeli war of aggression against Iran, the current "ceasefire" is not cause for celebration or complacency;
▪️Previous "ceasefires" and talk of "ceasefire" was used by the US and Israel to ELIMINATE the most senior level of Hezbollah's leadership late last year (pictured in this September 2024 Guardian article);
▪️Just as was the case with this most recent violence, the assassinations followed US-Israeli attacks on Hezbollah planned over the course of a year or more, making it an unprovoked act of war - diplomacy was used as a ploy to launch the strikes and create "plausible deniability" between the US and its Israeli proxies;
▪️Assume similar betrayal by the US and its proxies is imminent regarding Iran itself and prepare for the absolute worst, especially considering the level of deceit demonstrated by the current Trump administration;
▪️Despite apparent weakness exposed amid US-Israeli war of aggression against Iran, the current "ceasefire" is not cause for celebration or complacency;
▪️Previous "ceasefires" and talk of "ceasefire" was used by the US and Israel to ELIMINATE the most senior level of Hezbollah's leadership late last year (pictured in this September 2024 Guardian article);
▪️Just as was the case with this most recent violence, the assassinations followed US-Israeli attacks on Hezbollah planned over the course of a year or more, making it an unprovoked act of war - diplomacy was used as a ploy to launch the strikes and create "plausible deniability" between the US and its Israeli proxies;
▪️Assume similar betrayal by the US and its proxies is imminent regarding Iran itself and prepare for the absolute worst, especially considering the level of deceit demonstrated by the current Trump administration;
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇮🇱🇩🇪 German state TV journalist in Israel:
➡️ You can’t know how many military targets Iran hit!
➡️ Join us! | @MyLordBebo
“Israel did not allow us to film or report Iranian missile impacts on military and strategic locations.
We were only allowed to show impacts civilian areas.”
➡️ You can’t know how many military targets Iran hit!
➡️ Join us! | @MyLordBebo
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
RFK Jr: "My vision is that every American is wearing a wearable (a real-time data collection device) within four years."
Wearables made by Palantir
Wearables made by Palantir
Forwarded from 🇵🇸 Automated Apartheid in Palestine
🇵🇸Israel is building a tunnel to cut off Palestinians from the heart of the West Bank | Mondoweiss
Israel is constructing tunnels that Palestinians will be required to pass through in the heart of the #WestBank, making large parts of the occupied territory accessible only to Israelis. The aim is to remove the Palestinian presence around Jerusalem.
#Palestine #Apartheid #Genocide
Israel is constructing tunnels that Palestinians will be required to pass through in the heart of the #WestBank, making large parts of the occupied territory accessible only to Israelis. The aim is to remove the Palestinian presence around Jerusalem.
#Palestine #Apartheid #Genocide
Forwarded from The Cradle
⭕️ CNN: A classified US intelligence assessment has reportedly found that US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities did not destroy the country’s nuclear program — despite President Trump’s claims of “total obliteration.”
Key findings from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA):
– Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is undamaged
– Centrifuges remain largely intact
– Strikes mainly hit aboveground structures, not underground cores
– Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan were all struck, but deep underground infrastructure survived
– Tomahawk missiles were used on Isfahan, instead of bunker busters, due to its extreme depth
– The impact was limited mostly to power infrastructure and aboveground processing facilities
– Setback estimated at only a few months
Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and other officials insist the mission was a success — but even weapons experts and satellite imagery analysts say the core nuclear capabilities survived.
Meanwhile, Trump canceled classified briefings to Congress, sparking outrage among lawmakers.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told CNN in a statement:
“This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as ‘top secret’ but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community. The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran’s nuclear program. Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.”
Key findings from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA):
– Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is undamaged
– Centrifuges remain largely intact
– Strikes mainly hit aboveground structures, not underground cores
– Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan were all struck, but deep underground infrastructure survived
– Tomahawk missiles were used on Isfahan, instead of bunker busters, due to its extreme depth
– The impact was limited mostly to power infrastructure and aboveground processing facilities
– Setback estimated at only a few months
Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and other officials insist the mission was a success — but even weapons experts and satellite imagery analysts say the core nuclear capabilities survived.
Meanwhile, Trump canceled classified briefings to Congress, sparking outrage among lawmakers.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told CNN in a statement:
“This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as ‘top secret’ but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community. The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran’s nuclear program. Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.”
🇮🇷Sergey Shilov takes stock of the West's short war against Iran:
"Israel has once again demonstrated its technical superiority and its ability to conduct unconventional actions. The start and scale of the operation were unexpected for Iran. Israel has gained air superiority over Tehran and the west of the country.
The obvious lesson here is that control of the skies is key.
The experience of this war will undoubtedly be studied by all countries of the world and will promote the development of future air defense systems, which are currently proving obsolete when faced with an adversary using modern technologies.
Has Israel succeeded in destroying Iran's nuclear program? I doubt it. However, it has undoubtedly succeeded in slowing its development. The Mossad hacked into uranium enrichment centrifuges through cyberattacks in the 1990s and 2000s, carried out sabotage in Lebanon, and supplied booby-trapped equipment through "grey companies" and their agents.
Today, we are witnessing a much more serious situation. In Israel, Netanyahu's actions will be presented as a victory, although his opponents will try to use this war against him.
Iran has demonstrated its ability to withstand a heavy blow after a heavy defeat. It was able to respond, albeit after a delay, with its strategic forces.
Despite the losses, the immediate destruction of its air defense and mobile missile systems, the military potential of the Persians, accumulated over the years, demonstrated that only a prolonged and unfavorable war for the enemy could break them.
By cutting off internet access, the Persians have significantly reduced the effectiveness of Israeli propaganda on the Iranian population. Iran has demonstrated the loyalty of its population: it is too soon to bury the Islamic regime, despite the presence of numerous Israeli agents and many disaffected people.
During the negotiations, Iran showed its reluctance to capitulate, and was able to agree with Washington on an end-of-conflict scenario, similar to those of previous years, during which both sides agreed on symbolic false strikes.
However, the biggest problems await Iran during the lull, when economic difficulties resurface and the population begins to protest. It is unlikely that Western economic sanctions will be lifted. All this will only intensify the internal struggles within the country. The Persians may well move their capital south from Tehran, a project that has been under discussion for some time. But this also carries dangers.
Will the Iranians be able to build the bomb? The question remains open, but the example of North Korea, spared by Trump, will push them even further.
America, represented by Trump, has once again demonstrated that the West's word cannot be trusted. There is nothing to argue with them: they only understand force.
The Iranian regime has not fallen, and the Strait of Hormuz, which is especially important for China, the US's main economic rival, and for energy supplies to Europe, another US rival, has not been closed. However, the United States will not give up its attempts to destabilize Iran and cut off China's economic routes.
Moreover, Trump has opened the "Overton Window" for Russia, openly discussing the possibility of the US using nuclear weapons again. This is no joke. Everything always starts with chatter.
This "12-day war" may have saved everyone's face, but in reality no one achieved all of their objectives, so the war will resume later.
https://t.me/bayraktar1070/4647
#Iran
"Israel has once again demonstrated its technical superiority and its ability to conduct unconventional actions. The start and scale of the operation were unexpected for Iran. Israel has gained air superiority over Tehran and the west of the country.
The obvious lesson here is that control of the skies is key.
The experience of this war will undoubtedly be studied by all countries of the world and will promote the development of future air defense systems, which are currently proving obsolete when faced with an adversary using modern technologies.
Has Israel succeeded in destroying Iran's nuclear program? I doubt it. However, it has undoubtedly succeeded in slowing its development. The Mossad hacked into uranium enrichment centrifuges through cyberattacks in the 1990s and 2000s, carried out sabotage in Lebanon, and supplied booby-trapped equipment through "grey companies" and their agents.
Today, we are witnessing a much more serious situation. In Israel, Netanyahu's actions will be presented as a victory, although his opponents will try to use this war against him.
Iran has demonstrated its ability to withstand a heavy blow after a heavy defeat. It was able to respond, albeit after a delay, with its strategic forces.
Despite the losses, the immediate destruction of its air defense and mobile missile systems, the military potential of the Persians, accumulated over the years, demonstrated that only a prolonged and unfavorable war for the enemy could break them.
By cutting off internet access, the Persians have significantly reduced the effectiveness of Israeli propaganda on the Iranian population. Iran has demonstrated the loyalty of its population: it is too soon to bury the Islamic regime, despite the presence of numerous Israeli agents and many disaffected people.
During the negotiations, Iran showed its reluctance to capitulate, and was able to agree with Washington on an end-of-conflict scenario, similar to those of previous years, during which both sides agreed on symbolic false strikes.
However, the biggest problems await Iran during the lull, when economic difficulties resurface and the population begins to protest. It is unlikely that Western economic sanctions will be lifted. All this will only intensify the internal struggles within the country. The Persians may well move their capital south from Tehran, a project that has been under discussion for some time. But this also carries dangers.
Will the Iranians be able to build the bomb? The question remains open, but the example of North Korea, spared by Trump, will push them even further.
America, represented by Trump, has once again demonstrated that the West's word cannot be trusted. There is nothing to argue with them: they only understand force.
The Iranian regime has not fallen, and the Strait of Hormuz, which is especially important for China, the US's main economic rival, and for energy supplies to Europe, another US rival, has not been closed. However, the United States will not give up its attempts to destabilize Iran and cut off China's economic routes.
Moreover, Trump has opened the "Overton Window" for Russia, openly discussing the possibility of the US using nuclear weapons again. This is no joke. Everything always starts with chatter.
This "12-day war" may have saved everyone's face, but in reality no one achieved all of their objectives, so the war will resume later.
https://t.me/bayraktar1070/4647
#Iran
Telegram
Свидетели Байрактара
Иран-Израиль. Беглые мысли по итогам перемирия
Израиль вновь продемонстрировал свое техническое превосходство и способность к нестандартным действиям. Начало и масштабы операции стали внезапными для Ирана. Израиль обеспечил себе превосходство в воздухе над…
Израиль вновь продемонстрировал свое техническое превосходство и способность к нестандартным действиям. Начало и масштабы операции стали внезапными для Ирана. Израиль обеспечил себе превосходство в воздухе над…
🇮🇷The unspoken truth about the Iranian nuclear program, by Thierry Meyssan | Voltairenet ( not full translation*)
The stakes of Iran's nuclear program are not what we think. Tehran renounced the atomic bomb in 1988, but is attempting, with Russia's cooperation, to discover the secrets of nuclear fusion. If it succeeds, it would help the Southern states decolonize by freeing themselves from oil.
As for the stakes of the bombing of certain Iranian nuclear sites by the United States, they may also not be what we think. This affair is all the more opaque because it is currently impossible to establish a clear distinction between research on civilian #NuclearFusion and military fusion.
#Iran
1/4
The stakes of Iran's nuclear program are not what we think. Tehran renounced the atomic bomb in 1988, but is attempting, with Russia's cooperation, to discover the secrets of nuclear fusion. If it succeeds, it would help the Southern states decolonize by freeing themselves from oil.
As for the stakes of the bombing of certain Iranian nuclear sites by the United States, they may also not be what we think. This affair is all the more opaque because it is currently impossible to establish a clear distinction between research on civilian #NuclearFusion and military fusion.
#Iran
1/4
- -
Since the fall of Iraq, under the blows of the British and the United States, London and Washington have popularized the myth of Iranian military nuclear power, in line with that of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. This myth has been taken up by Israeli "revisionist Zionists" (not to be confused with "Zionists" tout court) and their leader, Benjamin Netanyahu. For twenty years, Westerners have been inundated with this propaganda and have ended up believing it, although announcing for such a long period that Tehran will have "the" bomb "next year" makes no sense.
However, even though Russia, China, and the United States all agree that there is currently no Iranian military program, everyone clearly sees that Iran is doing something with its nuclear power plants. But what?
In 2005, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected President of the Islamic Republic, replacing Sayyed Mohammad Khatami. He is a scientist whose vision is to free colonized peoples. He therefore believes that by mastering the atom, he will enable all peoples to free themselves from Western oil transnationals.
Iran then developed training programs for nuclear scientists in numerous universities. The goal was not to create a small elite of a few hundred specialists, but to train battalions of engineers.
2/2
Since the fall of Iraq, under the blows of the British and the United States, London and Washington have popularized the myth of Iranian military nuclear power, in line with that of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. This myth has been taken up by Israeli "revisionist Zionists" (not to be confused with "Zionists" tout court) and their leader, Benjamin Netanyahu. For twenty years, Westerners have been inundated with this propaganda and have ended up believing it, although announcing for such a long period that Tehran will have "the" bomb "next year" makes no sense.
However, even though Russia, China, and the United States all agree that there is currently no Iranian military program, everyone clearly sees that Iran is doing something with its nuclear power plants. But what?
In 2005, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected President of the Islamic Republic, replacing Sayyed Mohammad Khatami. He is a scientist whose vision is to free colonized peoples. He therefore believes that by mastering the atom, he will enable all peoples to free themselves from Western oil transnationals.
Iran then developed training programs for nuclear scientists in numerous universities. The goal was not to create a small elite of a few hundred specialists, but to train battalions of engineers.
2/2
- -
Iran intends to discover how to achieve nuclear fusion, whereas Westerners are content with fission. Fission is the splitting of an atom; while fusion is the joining of atoms, which releases an immeasurable amount of energy.
Fission is used in our power plants, while fusion is currently used only in thermonuclear bombs. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's plan is to use it to generate electricity and share it with developing countries.
This knowledge is revolutionary, in the Khomeinist sense of the term, that is, it allows for the end of the dependence of the Southern states and their economic development. It clashes head-on with the British vision of colonialism, according to which His Majesty had to divide and rule and prevent the development of the colonized. We remember, for example, that London banned Indians from spinning the cotton they grew themselves so that it could be spun by its Manchester mills. In response, Mahatma Gandhi set an example for his people and spun his own cotton, defying the British monarchy. Similarly, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's project challenges the power of the West and Anglo-Saxon oil transnationals.
It is perfectly understandable to be concerned about Iranian investment in nuclear power because these technologies are, by definition, dual-use, both civilian and military. It is clear that this is not the usual civilian use, and that the detailed discovery of fusion processes could also be used for military purposes. In any case, Iran is seeking an inexhaustible source of energy.
China and Russia have repeatedly stated that Iran has not had a military nuclear program since 1988. Unlike us, Russia knows what it is talking about: it is involved in Iran's research. There are Russians in many Iranian nuclear facilities. It goes without saying that Moscow fears proliferation as much as we do. But, unlike us, not civilian nuclear power. Building on the work of Andrei Sakharov, Rosatom and the Russian Academy of Sciences are continuing their research, particularly for the Tokamak project. China, South Korea, the United Kingdom and France have their own research on this subject.
3/4
Iran intends to discover how to achieve nuclear fusion, whereas Westerners are content with fission. Fission is the splitting of an atom; while fusion is the joining of atoms, which releases an immeasurable amount of energy.
Fission is used in our power plants, while fusion is currently used only in thermonuclear bombs. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's plan is to use it to generate electricity and share it with developing countries.
This knowledge is revolutionary, in the Khomeinist sense of the term, that is, it allows for the end of the dependence of the Southern states and their economic development. It clashes head-on with the British vision of colonialism, according to which His Majesty had to divide and rule and prevent the development of the colonized. We remember, for example, that London banned Indians from spinning the cotton they grew themselves so that it could be spun by its Manchester mills. In response, Mahatma Gandhi set an example for his people and spun his own cotton, defying the British monarchy. Similarly, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's project challenges the power of the West and Anglo-Saxon oil transnationals.
It is perfectly understandable to be concerned about Iranian investment in nuclear power because these technologies are, by definition, dual-use, both civilian and military. It is clear that this is not the usual civilian use, and that the detailed discovery of fusion processes could also be used for military purposes. In any case, Iran is seeking an inexhaustible source of energy.
China and Russia have repeatedly stated that Iran has not had a military nuclear program since 1988. Unlike us, Russia knows what it is talking about: it is involved in Iran's research. There are Russians in many Iranian nuclear facilities. It goes without saying that Moscow fears proliferation as much as we do. But, unlike us, not civilian nuclear power. Building on the work of Andrei Sakharov, Rosatom and the Russian Academy of Sciences are continuing their research, particularly for the Tokamak project. China, South Korea, the United Kingdom and France have their own research on this subject.
3/4
- -
It should also be remembered that Iran is a signatory to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). It is for this reason that it is subject to inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Since 1988, the IAEA has never found any evidence suggesting that Iran still has a military nuclear program. However, the Agency has asked numerous questions to clarify certain aspects of its civilian program and has not received any answers, which is perfectly understandable given the investment in Iranian-Russian fusion research. In practice, the documents released by the Iranian press two days before the Israeli attack attest that the director of the IAEA, the Argentinian Rafael Grossi, behaves like a spy in the service of Israel, to which he transmits all the information from its inspectors; this is despite the fact that Israel is not a signatory to the NPT and therefore not a member of the IAEA.
On 4 May 2010, Tehran submitted a proposal to the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations NPT for the "Establishment of a Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone in the Middle East" [1]. This proposal was welcomed by all the states in the region, with the exception of Israel. Indeed, Tel Aviv, which benefited from transfers of French technology from senior officials of the Fourth Republic, possesses the atomic bomb [2].
4/4
#Iran
It should also be remembered that Iran is a signatory to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). It is for this reason that it is subject to inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Since 1988, the IAEA has never found any evidence suggesting that Iran still has a military nuclear program. However, the Agency has asked numerous questions to clarify certain aspects of its civilian program and has not received any answers, which is perfectly understandable given the investment in Iranian-Russian fusion research. In practice, the documents released by the Iranian press two days before the Israeli attack attest that the director of the IAEA, the Argentinian Rafael Grossi, behaves like a spy in the service of Israel, to which he transmits all the information from its inspectors; this is despite the fact that Israel is not a signatory to the NPT and therefore not a member of the IAEA.
On 4 May 2010, Tehran submitted a proposal to the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations NPT for the "Establishment of a Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone in the Middle East" [1]. This proposal was welcomed by all the states in the region, with the exception of Israel. Indeed, Tel Aviv, which benefited from transfers of French technology from senior officials of the Fourth Republic, possesses the atomic bomb [2].
4/4
#Iran
Forwarded from Al-Akhbar English
House Rejects Impeachment Bid Over Trump’s Iran Strikes Amid Rising Democratic Concern
The US House of Representatives rejected an impeachment bid against President Donald Trump, introduced by Democratic Representative Al Green. He accused Trump of abusing power by launching military strikes on Iran without congressional approval. The motion was defeated with 344 votes against and only 79 in favor.
Despite the outcome, Green defended his move, arguing that no president should have the authority to take the country to war without consulting Congress. He said the action was not taken lightly but was necessary to uphold the Constitution.
This was not the first impeachment attempt during Trump’s second term and reflects growing Democratic concern after the surprise strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. The operation was seen as a risky move, drawing criticism from figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who called it an impeachable offense.
(Photo: Web)
The US House of Representatives rejected an impeachment bid against President Donald Trump, introduced by Democratic Representative Al Green. He accused Trump of abusing power by launching military strikes on Iran without congressional approval. The motion was defeated with 344 votes against and only 79 in favor.
Despite the outcome, Green defended his move, arguing that no president should have the authority to take the country to war without consulting Congress. He said the action was not taken lightly but was necessary to uphold the Constitution.
This was not the first impeachment attempt during Trump’s second term and reflects growing Democratic concern after the surprise strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. The operation was seen as a risky move, drawing criticism from figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who called it an impeachable offense.
(Photo: Web)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Donald Trump posts a “Bomb bomb Iran” music video featuring lyrics, including “Went to a mosque, gonna throw some rocks”, “put the ayatollah in a box”
If you post this but talking about bombing USA or isn'treal and their dictators, nowadays you get censored, jailed, deported, denied entrance...
#fdt
If you post this but talking about bombing USA or isn'treal and their dictators, nowadays you get censored, jailed, deported, denied entrance...
#fdt
Forwarded from MintPress News
Palestine Action raises over £100,000 in 24 hours to challenge proscription by the UK government as a terrorist organisation.
Harvard-linked study finds israel ‘disappeared’ nearly 400,000 Palestinians in #Gaza, half of them #children: Report
A study published via the #Harvard Dataverse reveals that Israel has “disappeared” at least 377,000 Palestinians since the start of its genocidal campaign against the Gaza Strip in 2023.
Half of this number is believed to be Palestinian children.
The report was written by Israeli professor Yaakov Garb, who used data-driven analysis and spatial mapping to show how the israeli army’s siege of Gaza and indiscriminate attacks on civilians in the enclave have led to a serious drop in its population.
The 377,000 Palestinians who are unaccounted for due to israel’s #genocide are approximately 17 percent of the Gaza Strip’s entire population, which now stands at about 1.85 million. Prior to the war in Gaza, the strip’s population was estimated at 2.227 million.
Garb also condemned in the report the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) – a controversial US-israeli aid distribution mechanism launched last month.
“These aid compounds seem to reflect a logic of control, not assistance, and it would be a misnomer to call them 'humanitarian aid distribution hubs'. They do not adhere to humanitarian principles, and much of their design and operation is guided by other objectives, which undermine their declared purpose,” he said.
🔗 https://thecradle.co/articles-id/31546
A study published via the #Harvard Dataverse reveals that Israel has “disappeared” at least 377,000 Palestinians since the start of its genocidal campaign against the Gaza Strip in 2023.
Half of this number is believed to be Palestinian children.
The report was written by Israeli professor Yaakov Garb, who used data-driven analysis and spatial mapping to show how the israeli army’s siege of Gaza and indiscriminate attacks on civilians in the enclave have led to a serious drop in its population.
The 377,000 Palestinians who are unaccounted for due to israel’s #genocide are approximately 17 percent of the Gaza Strip’s entire population, which now stands at about 1.85 million. Prior to the war in Gaza, the strip’s population was estimated at 2.227 million.
Garb also condemned in the report the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) – a controversial US-israeli aid distribution mechanism launched last month.
“These aid compounds seem to reflect a logic of control, not assistance, and it would be a misnomer to call them 'humanitarian aid distribution hubs'. They do not adhere to humanitarian principles, and much of their design and operation is guided by other objectives, which undermine their declared purpose,” he said.
🔗 https://thecradle.co/articles-id/31546
Forwarded from The Cradle
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Former ABC journalist Antoinette Lattouf has won her case against the national broadcaster after being dismissed for sharing a human rights report about Gaza on social media.
Lattouf, a prominent Australian journalist and commentator, was terminated from her role at the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) after posting a report from Human Rights Watch on her personal social media account.
Lattouf, a prominent Australian journalist and commentator, was terminated from her role at the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) after posting a report from Human Rights Watch on her personal social media account.