The #AI That Triggered a War: How Palantir and the IAEA Fueled israel’s strike on Iran
A $50M software built for counterinsurgency now steers nuclear diplomacy... and may have lit the fuse for a regional war.
https://ddgeopolitics.substack.com/p/the-ai-that-triggered-a-war-how-palantir
...But what if the intelligence fueling this war came not from Mossad or Pentagon satellites but from a #UN agency’s software? Since 2015, the #IAEA has relied on #Palantir’s #Mosaic platform, a $50-million AI system that sifts 400 million data points—satellite imagery, social media, personnel logs—to predict nuclear threats. On June 12, Iran leaked documents it claimed showed IAEA chief Rafael Grossi shared Mosaic outputs with Israel, effectively turning the agency into a “tool for aggression.” The charge echoes a pattern: prior to 2025, Mosaic data helped shape sanctions and even UN aid decisions despite risks of bias...
...The problem? Mosaic’s lineage screams bias. Funded by #InQTel, the CIA’s venture arm, #Palantir powers IDF targeting in #Gaza and #Ukraine’s #drone strikes. Mosaic’s black-box algorithms, unauditable and proprietary, risk turning the IAEA from neutral inspector into a data proxy for preemptive war. As we’ll explore with Fordow’s role, this software may have already crossed that line, threatening the Non-Proliferation Treaty it was meant to uphold...
...Mosaic, crunching 400 million data points since 2015, mapped Fordow’s centrifuge cascades and satellite imagery, flagging anomalies as threats. Its AI, built for counterinsurgency, predicts intent—perfect for crafting a “nine-bomb” narrative. The May 31 report cited undeclared traces at Lavisan-Shian and Turquzabad, echoing 2018 when Mosaic’s findings sparked sanctions despite Iran’s “sabotage” claims. Iran’s nuclear chief, Behrouz Kamalvandi, alleged in 2025 that Turquzabad’s coordinates were “planted,” suggesting fabricated evidence. Iran’s June 12 leak, claiming Rafael Grossi shared Mosaic data with Israel, deepened suspicions...
...The answer lies in Mosaic’s design. Originally built to identify insurgent activity in Iraq and Afghanistan, Mosaic infers hostile intent from indirect indicators—metadata, behavioral patterns, signal traffic—not from confirmed evidence. When repurposed for nuclear oversight, this logic translates correlation into alarm. That Mosaic also powers IDF targeting systems in Gaza and Ukraine makes its presence inside the IAEA all the more explosive...
@FuryRoad_Intel
A $50M software built for counterinsurgency now steers nuclear diplomacy... and may have lit the fuse for a regional war.
https://ddgeopolitics.substack.com/p/the-ai-that-triggered-a-war-how-palantir
...But what if the intelligence fueling this war came not from Mossad or Pentagon satellites but from a #UN agency’s software? Since 2015, the #IAEA has relied on #Palantir’s #Mosaic platform, a $50-million AI system that sifts 400 million data points—satellite imagery, social media, personnel logs—to predict nuclear threats. On June 12, Iran leaked documents it claimed showed IAEA chief Rafael Grossi shared Mosaic outputs with Israel, effectively turning the agency into a “tool for aggression.” The charge echoes a pattern: prior to 2025, Mosaic data helped shape sanctions and even UN aid decisions despite risks of bias...
...The problem? Mosaic’s lineage screams bias. Funded by #InQTel, the CIA’s venture arm, #Palantir powers IDF targeting in #Gaza and #Ukraine’s #drone strikes. Mosaic’s black-box algorithms, unauditable and proprietary, risk turning the IAEA from neutral inspector into a data proxy for preemptive war. As we’ll explore with Fordow’s role, this software may have already crossed that line, threatening the Non-Proliferation Treaty it was meant to uphold...
...Mosaic, crunching 400 million data points since 2015, mapped Fordow’s centrifuge cascades and satellite imagery, flagging anomalies as threats. Its AI, built for counterinsurgency, predicts intent—perfect for crafting a “nine-bomb” narrative. The May 31 report cited undeclared traces at Lavisan-Shian and Turquzabad, echoing 2018 when Mosaic’s findings sparked sanctions despite Iran’s “sabotage” claims. Iran’s nuclear chief, Behrouz Kamalvandi, alleged in 2025 that Turquzabad’s coordinates were “planted,” suggesting fabricated evidence. Iran’s June 12 leak, claiming Rafael Grossi shared Mosaic data with Israel, deepened suspicions...
...The answer lies in Mosaic’s design. Originally built to identify insurgent activity in Iraq and Afghanistan, Mosaic infers hostile intent from indirect indicators—metadata, behavioral patterns, signal traffic—not from confirmed evidence. When repurposed for nuclear oversight, this logic translates correlation into alarm. That Mosaic also powers IDF targeting systems in Gaza and Ukraine makes its presence inside the IAEA all the more explosive...
@FuryRoad_Intel
Substack
The AI That Triggered a War: How Palantir and the IAEA Fueled Israel’s Strike on Iran
A $50M software built for counterinsurgency now steers nuclear diplomacy... and may have lit the fuse for a regional war.