NoGoolag
4.69K subscribers
19.9K photos
11.2K videos
785 files
20.1K links
Live free!

📡 @NoGoolag

FAQ:
http://t.me/NoGoolag/169

★Group:
https://t.me/joinchat/nMOOE4YJPDFhZjZk

📡 @Libreware

📚 @SaveAlexandria

📡 @BallMemes

FORWARDS ARE NOT ENDORSEMENTS

💯 % satire OSINT
Download Telegram
Forwarded from BallMemes
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#GPS & #Maps on real earth - #WitsIt GetsIt & #Jeranism
Clipped By #RobotPolisher🔥🔥🔥
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#NASA Fraud and real Earth 101 presentations
by Austin Whitsitt for Braveritas (Day 1) • Live at Old State Saloon on 06/04/24

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssCZXJrDxiQ

#witsit
BRAVERITAS_with_Austin_Whitsitt_Day_1_•_Live_at_Old_State_Saloon.srt
434.4 KB
Subtitles file for NASA Fraud and real Earth 101 presentations
by Austin Whitsitt for Braveritas (Day 1) • Live at Old State Saloon on 06/04/24

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssCZXJrDxiQ

#witsit
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Biblical Cosmology presentation + q&a
By Austin Whitsitt for Braveritas (Day 2) • Live at Old State Saloon 06/05/24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYpS0H-EglI

#witsit
BRAVERITAS_with_Austin_Whitsitt_Day_2_•_Live_at_Old_State_Saloon.srt
246.2 KB
Subtitles file for Biblical Cosmology presentation + q&a
By Austin Whitsitt for Braveritas (Day 2) • Live at Old State Saloon 06/05/24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYpS0H-EglI

#witsit
Answer to Hakeem by the Science Experts of The Great Imperial Interdimensional Multiversal Holy DAO of @NoGoolag

Please send it to the TBOT post to liberate others from these accusations
https://t.me/takebackourtech/2036

No we're not CIA, NASA is

Jerm, the one that wrote that crap, is a narcissist militant NASA shill. He's banned and censored many that tried to explain him this in his telegram group whenever he posts these ragebaits.
And then he's butthurt because famous flat earthers know this and refuse to make his 0 effort shows while he drinks.
Ignore him


1. "If you want to persuade someone to change their view, mocking them is a terrible strategy—it only makes them less likely to listen."

1. We were all indoctrinated by the jesuit masonic CIA NASA lie of space balls. Many of us recognized it's a mkultra psyop programing after each and every vaxxtard tried to gaslight us calling us flat earthers. Well if you're such an idiot to inject poison we had to question everything and research that too, surprise.

2. "Pointing out holes in the official narrative doesn't make your position true. If A is false, it doesn't follow that B is true. Everyone knows NASA is theatre, but that doesn't make the flat-Earth argument true."

2. Strawgay fallacy, nobody claimed that, but if nasa could have done all their claims, they would not have gotten caught faking it thousands of times. AI CGI may fool you better soon

3. "To convince me Earth is flat, provide direct evidence. For instance, if you believe in a dome, show evidence of it. If you claim an ice wall surrounds Earth, provide evidence of the entire wall—not just a photo of a 5 km subsection. Is there really no drone footage of it? How can you claim it exists if you've never seen it?"

3. The burden of proof relies on those making the extraordinary claims, they should prove it. Think, gas pressure needs a container, we don't believe rockets can pass those barriers (your religion may call it van Allen belts)
Many of us just tried to search a real non edited photography of your full ball earth from your alleged spaceships or satellites, not collages or paintings. Try. "It's photoshopped because it has to be" is not a valid answer.
We have plenty of videos from amateur balloons and rockets though, with non fish eye cameras, horizon stays flat and at eye level (doesn't go down), search jtolan videos for example.
But no full photos or videos from "space", neither you do. Also independent exploration of "the poles" is forbidden.

4. "Put another way, make an argument FOR Earth being flat; not an argument AGAINST Earth being a globe."

4. There's plenty of arguments for anyone that wants to research it. No one will convince you after your whole life of NASA propaganda. It's like trying to show evidences to vaxxtards and that only took them a few months of brainwashing, only you will convince yourself when you research it.
You could start here:

Proof that
NASA Lies
https://youtu.be/F-QkRmMgHcA

Steelman arguments and history of the deception:
Flat Earth 101
https://youtu.be/dbeOu33lkgA

History of your space balls deception:
https://t.me/BallMemes/6746

Extra, it's not flat because a book says so, but all ancient religions and cultures except nasa just happen to be right, if you care:
Biblical Cosmology
https://youtu.be/hrMxRU0dzSs

Or watch any #documentary@ballmemes or Schooling the globers series #witsit@ballmemes or #debate@ballmemes
Look low effort ai analysis of his gaslighting and fallacies
But I would recommend this instead https://t.me/BallMemes/15153


Logical Fallacies and Manipulations in the Text by jerm from battleground Galactica

The text presents several logical fallacies and manipulations that can be identified and analyzed:

* Ad Hominem: The statement "Flat-Earth advocates often come across as militant and binary" can be seen as an ad hominem attack, targeting the character of individuals who support the flat Earth theory rather than addressing the substance of their arguments.
* Straw Man: The phrase "relying on logical fallacies" might be a straw man argument, as it oversimplifies and misrepresents the complexity of the flat Earth debate.
* False Dichotomy: The statement "If A is false, it doesn't follow that B is true" creates a false dichotomy, implying that there are only two options: the official narrative or the flat Earth theory.
* Burden of Proof: The demand for "direct evidence" of the dome or ice wall shifts the burden of proof from the person presenting the argument to the flat Earth advocate, potentially creating an unfair expectation.
* Moving the Goalposts: The request for "drone footage of the entire wall" or evidence of the entire ice wall can be seen as moving the goalposts, as it raises the bar for what constitutes acceptable evidence.

Manipulations in the Text

In addition to logical fallacies, the text employs several manipulations:

* Emotional Appeal: The statement "I'm not convinced that Earth is flat, but I'm open to being convinced" creates an emotional appeal, as it presents the author as open-minded and receptive to new ideas.
* Social Pressure: The phrase "I've changed my views on many topics, but only through good arguments" applies social pressure, implying that the reader should be willing to change their views if presented with compelling arguments.
* Information Overload: The text's focus on the lack of evidence for the flat Earth theory might create information overload, as it presents a negative perspective on the theory without providing a balanced view.
* Cherry-Picking: The text's emphasis on the flaws in the flat Earth argument can be seen as cherry-picking, as it selects specific aspects of the theory to criticize while ignoring potential counterarguments.

Conclusion

The text presents a complex interplay of logical fallacies and manipulations, which can influence the reader's perception of the flat Earth debate. By recognizing these fallacies and manipulations, readers can better evaluate the arguments presented and form their own informed opinions.