Lo siento. Bitcoin escala y solo eso es lo que ofrece valor. Como dinero, como sistema para entregar efectivo electrónico P2P al mundo, Bitcoin es importante. Entonces, no, no tienen derecho a limitar el crecimiento de Bitcoin, y limitar que otros usen Bitcoin solo como algunos desean, manteniendo una idea falsamente romántica de ejecutar un nodo en casa.

Fue Keynes quien inició el mito de la Luna (to the moon). El mito de los que buscan la tesis del dinero infinito. Y es el mito de la luna en Bitcoin que es Keynes.
Bitcoin no es socialista y es hora de ver que es dinero, no solo para comprar queso verde y Lambo's, sino como efectivo global.

CSW
14 de septiembre de 2018
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1536946704000100

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2129
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Part 2
"Is Bitcoin a Biologically Inspired Network? - Roy Murphy - Bitstocks Podcast Ep.43 Pt. 2" en YouTube
https://youtu.be/8eBSm-oEaxQ

Copy
https://t.me/RamonQuesadaNews/8800
Dice un refrán que no se puede ver en otros, las virtudes que no tenemos.

Cuando se trata de autenticidad, la cosa se complica, porque en ocasiones confundimos las vitudes o defectos, con la autenticidad

Pongamos por ejemplo un billete de dinero, el hecho de que pueda estar, roto, viejo o manchado, es su estado, y eso ni quita, ni da autenticidad, en el caso de las personas, se puede tener defectos, se puede tener gracia, pero eso no da autenticidad, quizás para reconocer la autenticidad de una persona, hay que estudiar y adentrarse en su carácter.
Why I Believe Craig Wright is Satoshi.
597 visualizaciones
•29 abr 2021
Kevin Healy

6230 suscriptores

At the risk of being cancelled, in this video I explain why I believe Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of Bitcoin

https://youtu.be/3MJSEGnpgB8
One of the things that annoys me most is that people fall for common logical fallacies such as ad hominem.

Anyone who has the ability to think rationally will not care about the individual but rather the outcome

In politics, people talk about politicians having associations with business and say that this must necessarily be bad. It isn't. As long as the transactions are open there is nothing wrong with a politician who was also a businessman. As long as the bidding process is open, then there is no issue.

In fact, having politicians who are business people used to be the norm and it helps encourage economic reasoning in this group

The same thing occurs in my case and that of others like me.

We can then extend that to false authority, another logical fallacy

People have come to think that individuals are experts merely for longevity in this field. You are never an expert because you've been in the field for a period of time. An expert can develop in a year or may not develop in twenty years. Expertise is not a function of experience alone

Individual such as Antonopoulos or Eric Voorhees are recognised as experts merely because they were around when I launched bitcoin or just afterwards

That's not a foundation of expertise.

Many individuals attack my qualifications - but if you took the time to think about this there is a reason behind those attacks

none of these individuals have qualifications

none of the individuals being referenced as experts in cryptography or cryptographers are qualified in any way as a cryptographer

A cryptographer is not somebody who has worked developing software code.

Although it is possible that a cryptographer good learn to code, it is not essential in any way for a cryptographer to ever code in their life

Not one individual that I've seen referenced as an expert in bitcoin who is noted to be a cryptographer is qualified to be in an introductory role as a cryptographer

And I'm not making the statement idly

And community is irrelevant here

There are no community standards of being a cryptographer

Equally, even Hal Finney was not even a computer scientist let alone a cryptographer.

It is true that he had worked in the early days in the PGP Corporation.

He worked for a cryptographer.

He developed code for a cryptography company

But that does not make him either a computer scientist or a cryptographer

Dan Kaminsky has been called a cryptographer. The guy has had no real experience of cryptography anywhere in his life

Adam back is referenced as both an expert in distributed systems and a cryptographer
He has no basis in either field

Both Antonopoulos and Voorhees were practically or already homeless when they came to bitcoin.

Voorhees was to my knowledge living out of the back of his car. Antonopoulos was effectively unemployable. This is why these individuals are making up a false narrative about expertise. This is why I am such a threat to them.

I will graduate with at least three more degrees this year.

on top of that one or two more postgraduate certificates and diplomas

next year I will graduate with another 8 to 10 degrees

CSW
Apr 30, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1619779653352700?thread_ts=1619779653.352700&cid=C5131HKFX
Algunas palabras que he anotado sobre éste texto que ha escrito Craig hoy:

logical fallacies such as ad hominem.

think rationally

false authority

experts merely for longevity in this field.

Expertise is not a function of experience alone


qualifications

experts in cryptography or cryptographers

computer scientist
La educación, y con esto me refiero a una verdadera educación que enseñe el pensamiento racional y la capacidad de analizar lógicamente y responder a escenarios políticos es algo que mucha gente no quiere que tengas.

Cuando seas capaz de analizar y argumentar racionalmente, encontrarás que comienzas a ver el mundo de manera diferente.

Es importante destacar que comienza a ser capaz de comprender el razonamiento detrás de muchas decisiones que se toman, incluidas las razones detrás del impulso por la igualdad de resultados y otros aspectos de la sociedad posmoderna.

Cuando no abrazas la racionalidad y la lógica, abrazas un escenario fluido y un conjunto de anti-reglas que permiten que otros manipulen tu forma de actuar.

El argumento de Rousseaue será que no se puede ser libre en un sistema de orden y pensamiento racional, pero yo argumentaré lo contrario.

No puede ser libre a menos que pueda comprender los patrones de pensamiento lógicos y racionales y aprender a pensar verdaderamente por sí mismo

El conocimiento de lo que se vende y por qué puede cambiar de opinión es la forma en que se redactan las cosas, por lo que debería ser obligatorio.

CSW
30 de abril de 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1619783657372800?thread_ts=1619783657.372800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2141
En ésta pequeña frase están resumida muchas horas de debate sobre la gobernanza y la justicia de muchos métodos de consenso.

Centra toda tu atención en éste punto y preguntate si Cualquier otro mecanismo de justicia y gobernanza es mejor que esto y entonces habrás avanzado muchísimo y piensa racionalmente!!!!

https://twitter.com/RamonQuesadaT/status/1388305522965745664?s=19
IX SEMINARIO SOBRE CRIPTOECONOMÍA
Bitcoin y Startups, con Jaimexbt

Lunes 3 de mayo a las 19:00
UTC+2

Los beneficios de BSV para las empresas que comienzan (startups)

Regístrate en el siguiente enlace:
https://senderoikigai.com/web4/
el que habla es el actual presidente de la SEC. simplemente está jugando con los alumnos del MIT?

MIT 15.S12 Blockchain and Money, Fall 2018
Instructor: Prof. Gary Gensler

View the complete course: https://ocw.mit.edu/15-S12F18

YouTube Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...​

"5. Blockchain Basics & Transactions, UTXO and Script Code" en YouTube
https://youtu.be/zGDTt9Q3vyM
Spotted in the window of a Soho, NY restaurant 👀

https://twitter.com/_amanda_fab/status/1388194323708235778?s=21
"At the risk of being cancelled, in this video I explain why I believe Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, .."
Kevin Healy
29 abr 2021
https://youtu.be/3MJSEGnpgB8