🚨🇺🇸📉Scott Bessent: "China's escalation was a big mistake. They are playing with a pair of twos. We are the deficit country; what do we lose by the Chinese raising tariffs on us?"

This is very telling. He thinks China has more to lose from a trade war because they have a trade surplus, so they'd lose more money. He doesn't see the US losing more goods as being as big a problem.

This might make sense if imports were frivolous, but a lot are critical capital & infrastructure. Life isn't a game where money is the scoreboard. People want money because they want the things money buys, and these things can be far more critical than money. The US can conjure money out of thin air, but it can't conjure world class industries to replace Chinese imports with the same speed.

The key thing missed in this finance-centric view of trade is that trade barriers don't just hurt consumers, they hurt local producers by raising the cost of input goods. If the US wants to reindustrialize, it needs access to the best and cheapest steel, electronics, and countless other essential input goods. But China today is the leading producer of so much of these critical inputs, so when the US imposes tariffs on China, it makes it more difficult for American producers to competitively produce most things.

For example, China makes more than half the world's ships, the US less than 0.1%. But without Chinese steel, it's going to be very difficult for shipbuilding to take off in the US. China produces more than half the world's steel, and you're more likely to find the exact steel you want at the price you can afford in China than elsewhere. So for the foreseeable future, American industries are stuck paying tariffs on Chinese steel and on Chinese ships, and the longer they have to pay tariffs on Chinese steel, the harder it is for them to build competitive ships. This is but one example, but modern supply chains are so international and complex, there are many more.

On the other hand, the US is around ~15 of China's exports, or 2.7% of China's GDP. The US is ~4% of the world's population; the other 96% will buy what the US doesn't buy, even if at a discount. Yes, there will be a cost to China in terms of adjusting, but it's a lot better to have steel, electronics, high speed trains, and ships than America's fiat money, diabetes, porn, and genocide.

It seems insane, but the US regime really is threatening the livelihoods of billions in America and abroad because they are obsessed with the size of individual country trade deficits like it was a scoreboard in a sports game. It is almost certain that all countries will have deficits or surpluses with one another, just like individuals have surpluses and deficits with one another. You don't need to balance your trade with your employees by forcing them to buy your goods. You don't need to balance your trade with your supermarket by forcing it to buy whatever you sell.

America's problem is not any one particular deficit with any nation, it is persistent aggregate deficits with the entire world caused by having a fiat money printer. Simply: an ever increasing number of Americans can live off the money printer as long as the rest of the world is using the dollar. To actually solve this, rather than ruin billions of people's economic plans, the US government should just stop creating fake money and adopt a hard money standard with gold.

When Americans can't print money, they'll work and build industries. As long as they continue print money, they'll continue to import everything and export fake money, diabetes, porn, and genocide.

Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X