NoGoolag
4.54K subscribers
13.1K photos
6.88K videos
587 files
14.1K links
Live free!

πŸ“‘ @NoGoolag

FAQ:
http://t.me/NoGoolag/169

β˜…Group:
https://t.me/joinchat/nMOOE4YJPDFhZjZk

πŸ“‘ @Libreware

πŸ“‘ @TakeBackOurTech

🦊 @d3_works

πŸ“š @SaveAlexandria

πŸ’― % satire OSINT
Download Telegram
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
me and my shadow - take control of your data

πŸ’‘ What are digital traces?

Through your computer, mobile phone, and other digital devices, you leave behind hundreds of digital traces (also called data traces) every day: bits of information about you that are created, stored, and collected.

When your digital traces are put together to create stories about you or profiles of you, these become your digital shadows. These can give others huge insight into your life; and they can also be totally wrong. Either way, once they're out there, they are almost impossible to control....

πŸ‘€ πŸ‘‰πŸΌ https://myshadow.org/

#shadow #data #digital #traces #yourdata #toolkit #video #thinkabout
πŸ“‘@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_DE
πŸ“‘
@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_EN
πŸ“‘
@BlackBox_Archiv
πŸ“‘
@NoGoolag
What they do in the shadows - examining the far-right networks on Telegram

The present paper contributes to the research on the activities of far-right actors on social media by examining the interconnections between far-right actors and groups on Telegram platform using network analysis. The far-right network observed on Telegram is highly decentralized, similarly to the far-right networks found on other social media platforms. The network is divided mostly along the ideological and national lines, with the communities related to 4chan imageboard and Donald Trump’s supporters being the most influential.

The analysis of the network evolution shows that the start of its explosive growth coincides in time with the mass bans of the far-right actors on mainstream social media platforms. The observed patterns of network evolution suggest that the simultaneous migration of these actors to Telegram has allowed them to swiftly recreate their connections and gain prominence in the network thus casting doubt on the effectiveness of deplatforming for curbing the influence of far-right and other extremist actors.

πŸ‘€ πŸ‘‰πŸΌ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1803946

#telegram #tg #shadow #interconnections #research #analysis #extremist #4chan
πŸ“‘@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_DE
πŸ“‘
@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_EN
πŸ“‘
@BlackBox_Archiv
πŸ“‘
@NoGoolag
So, these asses have been scraping telegram searching for users and groups and building a whole goddamn database containing thousands of records of people talking/connecting/being in groups (which goes against telegram's main premise).

They even admit that governments use them... Which is also something Durov doesn't approve of.

And they cannot even sanitize their input.

πŸ‘€ πŸ‘‰πŸΌ https://t.me/BlackBox_Archiv/1166

#telegram #tg #durov #shadow #interconnections #research #analysis #gov #extremist #4chan #thinkabout
πŸ“‘@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_DE
πŸ“‘
@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_EN
πŸ“‘
@BlackBox_Archiv
πŸ“‘
@NoGoolag
The Pandemic's Digital Shadow

The pandemic is fueling digital repression worldwide.

The coronavirus pandemic is accelerating a dramatic decline in global internet freedom. For the 10th consecutive year, users have experienced an overall deterioration in their rights, and the phenomenon is contributing to a broader crisis for democracy worldwide.

In the COVID-19 era, connectivity is not a convenience, but a necessity. Virtually all human activitiesβ€”commerce, education, health care, politics, socializingβ€”seem to have moved online. But the digital world presents distinct challenges for human rights and democratic governance. State and nonstate actors in many countries are now exploiting opportunities created by the pandemic to shape online narratives, censor critical speech, and build new technological systems of social control.

Three notable trends punctuated an especially dismal year for internet freedom. First, political leaders used the pandemic as a pretext to limit access to information. Authorities often blocked independent news sites and arrested individuals on spurious charges of spreading false news. In many places, it was state officials and their zealous supporters who actually disseminated false and misleading information with the aim of drowning out accurate content, distracting the public from ineffective policy responses, and scapegoating certain ethnic and religious communities. Some states shut off connectivity for marginalized groups, extending and deepening existing digital divides. In short, governments around the world failed in their obligation to promote a vibrant and reliable online public sphere.

πŸ‘€ πŸ‘‰πŸΌ https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2020/pandemics-digital-shadow

πŸ‘€ πŸ‘‰πŸΌ Countries: πŸ‘‡πŸΌ
https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-net/scores?sort=desc&order=Country

#surveillance #pandemic #digital #shadow #report #netpolitics #thinkabout
πŸ“‘@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_DE
πŸ“‘
@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_EN
πŸ“‘
@BlackBox_Archiv
πŸ“‘
@NoGoolag